Comparison Overview

Kyocera

VS

Soar Print

Kyocera

None
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.mindiro.be

Kyocera is uw keuze voor al uw printbehoeften. U koopt de printer/multi-functional zelf aan en zorgt zelf voor de toners. Of u kiest voor een prijs per pagina waarbij dan alle toners en het technisch onderhoud zijn inbegrepen. Kyocera is voor op de concurrentie door : * het hoge printbereik en levensduur alvorens een drum dient vervangen te worden * een dynamisch prijsmodel voor kleurenafdrukken waarbij u niet een full-color betaalt maar afhankelijk van de hoeveelheid kleur die u gebruikt

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Soar Print

100 New North Road, Auckland, undefined, undefined, NZ
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.scg.net.nz

Soar Print and ICG have merged. Soar Printing Co Limited has been renamed as Soar Communications Limited (SCG). A New LinkedIn page has been created under the name SCG. SCG offers an extensive range of services, from short run digital printing to long run offset printing and large format printing as well as creative and publishing services. SCG is your go-to for sustainable, frictionless creation and deployment of print and marketing solutions. Delivering creative, content and print services beyond normal range. SCG is your partner for delivering purpose-defined Creative, Content, Production and Delivery Services across all relevant consumer touchpoints.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kyocera.jpeg
Kyocera
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soar-printing.jpeg
Soar Print
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kyocera
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Soar Print
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kyocera in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Soar Print in 2025.

Incident History — Kyocera (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kyocera cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Soar Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Soar Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kyocera.jpeg
Kyocera
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/soar-printing.jpeg
Soar Print
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kyocera company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Soar Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Soar Print company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kyocera company.

In the current year, Soar Print company and Kyocera company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Soar Print company nor Kyocera company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Soar Print company nor Kyocera company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Soar Print company nor Kyocera company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kyocera company nor Soar Print company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Soar Print company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kyocera company.

Soar Print company employs more people globally than Kyocera company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kyocera nor Soar Print holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References