Comparison Overview

Kym Abrams Design

VS

Studio Hekwerk

Kym Abrams Design

213 W Institute Pl. Suite 608, Chicago, Illinois, 60610, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

We are storytellers. Our clients do wonderful work in health care, education, arts and the environment. We help them tell their story. We start by listening, to learn about their mission and goals. We think with them about strategy, audience, message and budget. Then we work together to give their story a unique face and voice that make it memorable.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Studio Hekwerk

Scheldestraat 52 1823 WB Alkmaar, None, Alkmaar, Noord-Holland, NL, 1823 WB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 700 and 749

Ontwerpstudio voor eigenwijs grafisch ontwerp. Wij leveren grafisch vormgeving voor online- en offline communicatie zoals websites, facebookpagina's, brochures, huisstijlen, flyers en logo's. Studio Hekwerk bestaat uit directeur eigenaar Frank Kuin en werkt als een team samen met de opdrachtgever. Studio Hekwerk heeft geen personeel in dienst, maar heeft een uitgebreid netwerk van professionals, zoals fotografen, tekstschrijvers, programmeurs en communicatieadviseurs, waarmee samengewerkt wordt. Dit netwerk bestaat uit contacten die Frank in de afgelopen 15 jaar opgebouwd heeft als senior grafisch ontwerper en projectleider.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kym-abrams-design.jpeg
Kym Abrams Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-hekwerk.jpeg
Studio Hekwerk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kym Abrams Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio Hekwerk
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kym Abrams Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio Hekwerk in 2025.

Incident History — Kym Abrams Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kym Abrams Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio Hekwerk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio Hekwerk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kym-abrams-design.jpeg
Kym Abrams Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/studio-hekwerk.jpeg
Studio Hekwerk
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kym Abrams Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Studio Hekwerk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Studio Hekwerk company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kym Abrams Design company.

In the current year, Studio Hekwerk company and Kym Abrams Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio Hekwerk company nor Kym Abrams Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio Hekwerk company nor Kym Abrams Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio Hekwerk company nor Kym Abrams Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kym Abrams Design company nor Studio Hekwerk company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kym Abrams Design company nor Studio Hekwerk company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kym Abrams Design company employs more people globally than Studio Hekwerk company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kym Abrams Design nor Studio Hekwerk holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X