Comparison Overview

K & W finishing, inc.

VS

Swift Print Communications

K & W finishing, inc.

US, 21223
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

At K & W finishing, inc. we are committed to providing printers'​ with the same high quality, service, and turnaround they expect from their own in-house print-finishing departments. Our employees are some of the best in the industry and are ready to accept any challenge. We have grown and continue to thrive by giving our customer's the service they need to prosper. Contact one of our team members today and we'll do everything we can to help you look your best.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swift Print Communications

1248 Research Blvd, Saint Louis, Missouri, 63132, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Swift Print Communications is proud to announce that we’ve completed another record February of Insurance Annual Reports. In just 29 days we produced more than 5000 offset plates, printed, and bound the annual reports and shipped them out in record numbers. We’ve been doing this every February for over 80 years!! Our Oce'​ is almost 3 months old!! YOU should see some of the beautiful large format banners, window clings, sintra boards, scrim and foam core we are producing!! Please let us know if you would like to come for a demo or would like a sample!! In our continued effort to understand our customers’ needs we’re asking you, how does your company utilize Grand Format printing to help meet your marketing objectives and what are your biggest complaints in dealing these type of projects? Heard a really neat statistic today that we are proud of and just had to share it with everyone. Swift Print Communications has properly delivered a weekly mail piece for one of our clients for over 4000 straight weeks. Let us know if you would like to discuss establishing this type of long-term relationship.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 61
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kwfinishing.jpeg
K & W finishing, inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swift-print-communications.jpeg
Swift Print Communications
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
K & W finishing, inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swift Print Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K & W finishing, inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swift Print Communications in 2025.

Incident History — K & W finishing, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

K & W finishing, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swift Print Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swift Print Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kwfinishing.jpeg
K & W finishing, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swift-print-communications.jpeg
Swift Print Communications
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

K & W finishing, inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Swift Print Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swift Print Communications company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to K & W finishing, inc. company.

In the current year, Swift Print Communications company and K & W finishing, inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swift Print Communications company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swift Print Communications company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swift Print Communications company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. company nor Swift Print Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. company nor Swift Print Communications company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Swift Print Communications company employs more people globally than K & W finishing, inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Swift Print Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N