Comparison Overview

K & W finishing, inc.

VS

STL, Inc

K & W finishing, inc.

US, 21223
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kwfinishing.com

At K & W finishing, inc. we are committed to providing printers'​ with the same high quality, service, and turnaround they expect from their own in-house print-finishing departments. Our employees are some of the best in the industry and are ready to accept any challenge. We have grown and continue to thrive by giving our customer's the service they need to prosper. Contact one of our team members today and we'll do everything we can to help you look your best.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

STL, Inc

121 NE Victory Ave, None, Gresham, Oregon, US, 97030-0366
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://www.superlabel.com

STL, Inc manufactures the highest quality labels with efficient, innovative processes designed to reduce waste and eliminate error, making us one of the most reliable label vendors in the market. Our passion for top-notch customer service means a smooth, hassle-free experience and has lead to us being a key partner to our clients’ operations and an ally in driving efficiency and innovation into their production processes. We continually develop and improve processes, which creates value for our clients and brings the cost of label production down. Our innovative high-capacity spooled rolls provide an unmatched value by slashing downtime and saving our customers millions of dollars. As one of the most experienced manufacturers in the industry, STL is honored to partner with some of the world’s most sought after brands in developing label products and processes to meet the needs of the next generation of labeled goods. All of our labels are put through rigorous testing to ensure reliable, consistent quality, perfect function, and durability.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 55
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kwfinishing.jpeg
K & W finishing, inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superior-tape-&-label-inc.jpeg
STL, Inc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
K & W finishing, inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
STL, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K & W finishing, inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for STL, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — K & W finishing, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

K & W finishing, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — STL, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

STL, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kwfinishing.jpeg
K & W finishing, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/superior-tape-&-label-inc.jpeg
STL, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

K & W finishing, inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to STL, Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, STL, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to K & W finishing, inc. company.

In the current year, STL, Inc company and K & W finishing, inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither STL, Inc company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither STL, Inc company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither STL, Inc company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. company nor STL, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. company nor STL, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

STL, Inc company employs more people globally than K & W finishing, inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor STL, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References