Comparison Overview

K & W finishing, inc.

VS

Blocx

K & W finishing, inc.

US, 21223
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

At K & W finishing, inc. we are committed to providing printers'​ with the same high quality, service, and turnaround they expect from their own in-house print-finishing departments. Our employees are some of the best in the industry and are ready to accept any challenge. We have grown and continue to thrive by giving our customer's the service they need to prosper. Contact one of our team members today and we'll do everything we can to help you look your best.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Blocx

Rokerijweg 22, Huizen, 1271 AH, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Blocx is uw favoriete leverancier voor uiteenlopende blokken in zowel piepkleine als gigantische oplagen. Van slanke blocnotes met maar 50 velletjes tot kloeke 200-vels schrijfblokken. Grappige A7 blanco of gelinieerde miniblokjes, maar ook chique A3 blokken met in PMS of full colour bedrukte vellen. Gelijmd of geniet, met standaard of gepersonaliseerd dekblad. En altijd voor een scherpe prijs. De snelle, betrouwbare service en de hoogwaardige afwerking maken Blocx tot een gewaardeerd partner van scholen, grafische bureaus en collega-drukkerijen.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kwfinishing.jpeg
K & W finishing, inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blocx.jpeg
Blocx
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
K & W finishing, inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Blocx
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for K & W finishing, inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Blocx in 2025.

Incident History — K & W finishing, inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

K & W finishing, inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Blocx (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Blocx cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kwfinishing.jpeg
K & W finishing, inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/blocx.jpeg
Blocx
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Blocx company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to K & W finishing, inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Blocx company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to K & W finishing, inc. company.

In the current year, Blocx company and K & W finishing, inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Blocx company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Blocx company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Blocx company nor K & W finishing, inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. company nor Blocx company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. company nor Blocx company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

K & W finishing, inc. company employs more people globally than Blocx company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds HIPAA certification.

Neither K & W finishing, inc. nor Blocx holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N