Comparison Overview

Americana Restaurants

VS

Red Bull

Americana Restaurants

Al Nahda Street, Sharjah, UAE, undefined, AE
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Americana Restaurants is the largest restaurant operator in the MENA region and Kazakhstan in terms of number of restaurants in its countries of operations. Americana Restaurants operates iconic global brands such as KFC, Pizza Hut, Hardee’s, Krispy Kreme and TGI Fridays, along with proprietary brands such as Wimpy and Chicken Tikka across the MENA region and Kazakhstan for almost fifty years. The strength of Americana Restaurants is in the diversity of its portfolio which covers some of the most popular food categories including QSR, casual dining, indulgence, and coffee. Americana leverages the worldwide appeal and recall of its iconic brands, sustained focus on customer satisfaction, implementation of digital measures to increase efficiency in operations and enhance the customer experience. It replicates, improves and adapts to local tastes the tried-and-tested dining solutions from some of the world’s most popular brands with multi-decade global brand equity and high embedded customer trust, appeal and preference.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9,305
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Red Bull

Am Brunnen 1, None, Fuschl, None, AT, 5330
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

Red Bull Gives Wiiings to People and Ideas. This has driven us – and all we do – since 1987. Today, Red Bull operates in over 170 countries, selling more than 12 billion cans annually and growing! Above all, our people remain the essential ingredient in bringing the Red Bull brand to life. Check out our open roles to become part of the world of Red Bull. Most jobs take energy, ours give it. Check out our open roles to become part of the world of Red Bull – jobs.redbull.com

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 26,250
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kuwait-food-company-americana.jpeg
Americana Restaurants
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bull.jpeg
Red Bull
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Americana Restaurants
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Bull
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Americana Restaurants in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Bull in 2025.

Incident History — Americana Restaurants (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Americana Restaurants cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Bull (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Bull cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kuwait-food-company-americana.jpeg
Americana Restaurants
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-bull.jpeg
Red Bull
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Red Bull company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Americana Restaurants company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Red Bull company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Americana Restaurants company.

In the current year, Red Bull company and Americana Restaurants company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red Bull company nor Americana Restaurants company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Bull company nor Americana Restaurants company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Bull company nor Americana Restaurants company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Americana Restaurants company nor Red Bull company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Red Bull company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Americana Restaurants company.

Red Bull company employs more people globally than Americana Restaurants company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Americana Restaurants nor Red Bull holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H