Comparison Overview

Kunsthalle Bremen

VS

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)

Kunsthalle Bremen

207 Am Wall, Bremen (Altstadt), 28195, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://kunsthalle-bremen.de

Die Kunsthalle Bremen wird privat getragen durch den Kunstverein in Bremen und gehört zu den bedeutendsten und schönsten Museen in Europa. Die vielfältige Sammlung umspannt Kunstwerke aus sieben Jahrhunderten. Mit europäischer Malerei vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart, Skulpturen des 16. bis 21. Jahrhunderts sowie herausragenden Werken der internationalen Medienkunst spannt sie einen Bogen vom 14. Jahrhundert bis heute. Einen besonderen Schwerpunkt im Gesamtbestand bildet das Kupferstichkabinett, welches mit seinen über 220.000 Handzeichnungen und druckgraphischen Blättern zu den bedeutendsten graphischen Sammlungen in Europa gehört. In Dauer- und Wechselausstellungen gehen Sie bei einem Besuch der Kunsthalle auf eine spannende Reise durch die Kunstgeschichte.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)

9810 103A Ave NW, Edmonton, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca

The Royal Alberta Museum is a monumental expression of passion for the province we call home. A place where you'll find 2.5 million uniquely Albertan stories just waiting to be told. Space rocks, live bugs, enormous dinosaurs, wildlife, and personal accounts from people who have shaped our province come together in bold exhibits. A-ha moments await around every corner.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kunsthalle-bremen.jpeg
Kunsthalle Bremen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-alberta-museum.jpeg
Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kunsthalle Bremen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kunsthalle Bremen in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) in 2026.

Incident History — Kunsthalle Bremen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kunsthalle Bremen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kunsthalle-bremen.jpeg
Kunsthalle Bremen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-alberta-museum.jpeg
Royal Alberta Museum (RAM)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kunsthalle Bremen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kunsthalle Bremen company.

In the current year, Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company and Kunsthalle Bremen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company nor Kunsthalle Bremen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company nor Kunsthalle Bremen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company nor Kunsthalle Bremen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen company nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen company nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) company employs more people globally than Kunsthalle Bremen company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Royal Alberta Museum (RAM) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References