Comparison Overview

Kunsthalle Bremen

VS

Racine Heritage Museum

Kunsthalle Bremen

207 Am Wall, Bremen (Altstadt), 28195, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Die Kunsthalle Bremen wird privat getragen durch den Kunstverein in Bremen und gehört zu den bedeutendsten und schönsten Museen in Europa. Die vielfältige Sammlung umspannt Kunstwerke aus sieben Jahrhunderten. Mit europäischer Malerei vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart, Skulpturen des 16. bis 21. Jahrhunderts sowie herausragenden Werken der internationalen Medienkunst spannt sie einen Bogen vom 14. Jahrhundert bis heute. Einen besonderen Schwerpunkt im Gesamtbestand bildet das Kupferstichkabinett, welches mit seinen über 220.000 Handzeichnungen und druckgraphischen Blättern zu den bedeutendsten graphischen Sammlungen in Europa gehört. In Dauer- und Wechselausstellungen gehen Sie bei einem Besuch der Kunsthalle auf eine spannende Reise durch die Kunstgeschichte.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Racine Heritage Museum

701 Main St, Racine, Wisconsin, US, 53403-1211
Last Update: 2026-01-21

Racine Heritage Museum is home to over 200,000 artifacts and an extensive archival collection documenting our area's economic and cultural history. Our exhibit and educational program reflect our commitment to object-centered learning, and to exploring our area's historic and emergent technologies in their local cultural and worldwide contexts. The continuous interaction between people and the land generates the special character that is the spirit of a community. With each exhibit and educational program at Racine Heritage Museum, we strive to capture that spirit for a moment, and share something of our unique heritage of exploration and discovery, of innovation and invention, of entrepreneurship, of craftsmanship, and of diversity - the local stories and global impact of Racine's people and their products.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kunsthalle-bremen.jpeg
Kunsthalle Bremen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/racine-heritage-museum.jpeg
Racine Heritage Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kunsthalle Bremen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Racine Heritage Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kunsthalle Bremen in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Racine Heritage Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Kunsthalle Bremen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kunsthalle Bremen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Racine Heritage Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Racine Heritage Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kunsthalle-bremen.jpeg
Kunsthalle Bremen
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/racine-heritage-museum.jpeg
Racine Heritage Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Racine Heritage Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kunsthalle Bremen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Racine Heritage Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kunsthalle Bremen company.

In the current year, Racine Heritage Museum company and Kunsthalle Bremen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Racine Heritage Museum company nor Kunsthalle Bremen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Racine Heritage Museum company nor Kunsthalle Bremen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Racine Heritage Museum company nor Kunsthalle Bremen company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen company nor Racine Heritage Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen company nor Racine Heritage Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kunsthalle Bremen company employs more people globally than Racine Heritage Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kunsthalle Bremen nor Racine Heritage Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H