Comparison Overview

KRG Department of Foreign Relations

VS

Sitra

KRG Department of Foreign Relations

next to the Italian City residential complex, erbil, 44001, IQ
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://dfr.gov.krd

The Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) established the Department of Foreign Relations (DFR) in September 2006 to conduct relations with the international community. Today, the DFR is an integral part of the government, with a wide ranging portfolio of responsibilities. The KRG Department of Foreign Relations is mandated to promote the interests of the Kurdistan Region and its people in regard to relations with the international community and in accordance with the Region’s legislation and the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq. KRG pursues an open door policy in reaching out to the members of international community. Currently, 33 countries have their diplomatic representations in Erbil, including the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council. The KRG also has 14 representative offices worldwide.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sitra

Itämerenkatu 11-13, PL 160, Helsinki, none, FI, 00181
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 700 and 749
http://www.sitra.fi/

Suomen itsenäisyyden juhlarahasto on tulevaisuusorganisaatio, joka tekee töitä Suomen kilpailukyvyn ja suomalaisten hyvinvoinnin edistämiseksi. Ennakoimme yhteiskunnan muutosta, etsimme käytännön tekemisellä uusia toimintamalleja ja vauhditamme kestävään hyvinvointiin tähtäävää liiketoimintaa. The Finnish Innovation Fund Sitra is a future-oriented organisation that promotes Finland's competitiveness and the well-being of the Finnish people. We anticipate societal change, try out new operating models and accelerate business activities aimed at creating sustainable well-being.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 418
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krg-department-of-foreign-relations.jpeg
KRG Department of Foreign Relations
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sitra.jpeg
Sitra
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KRG Department of Foreign Relations
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sitra
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KRG Department of Foreign Relations in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sitra in 2025.

Incident History — KRG Department of Foreign Relations (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KRG Department of Foreign Relations cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sitra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sitra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/krg-department-of-foreign-relations.jpeg
KRG Department of Foreign Relations
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sitra.jpeg
Sitra
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sitra company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KRG Department of Foreign Relations company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sitra company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KRG Department of Foreign Relations company.

In the current year, Sitra company and KRG Department of Foreign Relations company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sitra company nor KRG Department of Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sitra company nor KRG Department of Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sitra company nor KRG Department of Foreign Relations company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations company nor Sitra company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations company nor Sitra company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Sitra company employs more people globally than KRG Department of Foreign Relations company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KRG Department of Foreign Relations nor Sitra holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References