Comparison Overview

KREATIVE

VS

Tek Ninja Design

KREATIVE

1725 220th St SE, Bothell, 98021, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We're a creative branding agency. We work together to define, strategize, design and develop the identity of future iconic brands. At KREATIVE, we believe in creating history through branding. A team of creative thinkers and business leaders from diverse backgrounds, we came together after encountering too many amazing companies with brand identities that just weren't living up to their potential. And we decided to do something about it.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 126
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tek Ninja Design

12100 ne 16 ave, miami, Florida, 33161, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

At Tek Ninja Design we make sure to give you a creative and professional outlook that will keep you on top of the cutting edge of your industry. Here at Tek Ninja Design we have been working on a variant of many interesting projects. From the Miami Florida area we have clients that are private defensive contractors; we have clients from the North Miami Beach area with law firms and accounting services. We also have been servicing new clients in the Atlanta Georgia, California, and New York regions. We are introducing new content, new services, and products from Tek Ninja Design.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kreative.jpeg
KREATIVE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tek-ninja-design.jpeg
Tek Ninja Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KREATIVE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tek Ninja Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KREATIVE in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tek Ninja Design in 2025.

Incident History — KREATIVE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KREATIVE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tek Ninja Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tek Ninja Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kreative.jpeg
KREATIVE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tek-ninja-design.jpeg
Tek Ninja Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tek Ninja Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KREATIVE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tek Ninja Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KREATIVE company.

In the current year, Tek Ninja Design company and KREATIVE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tek Ninja Design company nor KREATIVE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tek Ninja Design company nor KREATIVE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tek Ninja Design company nor KREATIVE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KREATIVE company nor Tek Ninja Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KREATIVE company nor Tek Ninja Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

KREATIVE company employs more people globally than Tek Ninja Design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KREATIVE nor Tek Ninja Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X