Comparison Overview

KPMG US

VS

Sicredi

KPMG US

345 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10154, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kpmg.com/US

KPMG is one of the world’s leading professional services firms and the fastest growing Big Four accounting firm in the United States. With 75+ offices and more than 40,000 employees and partners throughout the US, we’re leading the industry in new and exciting ways. Our size and strength make us much more agile and responsive to changing trends.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 51,262
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sicredi

Av. Assis Brasil, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 91010-003, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.sicredi.com.br

We are born collaborative We believe that change is only possible when everyone works together for the same purpose, after all, cooperativism is in our DNA. Besides this, we know that as important as it is to provide affordable financial solutions it is just as important to value growing together, quality of life and the social and economic development of everyone who makes this happen. Therefore, we are committed to our employees, our associates and the regions in which we operate. Together we make a difference We were fortunate to be recognized as one of the best companies in Brazil to work for. This recognition is a reflection of all the collective effort put into creating and maintaining a safe and welcoming work environment. Here numbers are not the most important thing, what really matters is that we are made up of people for people. We have opportunities for professionals from different areas and we recognize that working together makes a difference in our lives. Be part of this history, be Sicredi!

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 19,425
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg-us.jpeg
KPMG US
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sicredi.jpeg
Sicredi
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KPMG US
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sicredi
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG US in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sicredi in 2025.

Incident History — KPMG US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sicredi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sicredi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg-us.jpeg
KPMG US
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sicredi.jpeg
Sicredi
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KPMG US company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sicredi company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sicredi company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KPMG US company.

In the current year, Sicredi company and KPMG US company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sicredi company nor KPMG US company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sicredi company nor KPMG US company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sicredi company nor KPMG US company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KPMG US company nor Sicredi company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KPMG US company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sicredi company.

KPMG US company employs more people globally than Sicredi company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Sicredi holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References