Comparison Overview

KPMG US

VS

Barclays Investment Bank

KPMG US

345 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10154, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.kpmg.com/US

KPMG is one of the world’s leading professional services firms and the fastest growing Big Four accounting firm in the United States. With 75+ offices and more than 40,000 employees and partners throughout the US, we’re leading the industry in new and exciting ways. Our size and strength make us much more agile and responsive to changing trends.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 51,262
Subsidiaries: 73
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Barclays Investment Bank

745 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY, 10019, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
https://www.barclays.com/ib

Barclays Investment Bank deploys financial solutions to help our clients with their funding, financing, strategic and risk management needs across sectors, markets and economies. The Investment Bank is comprised of the Investment Banking, International Corporate Banking, Global Markets and Research businesses, aiding money managers, financial institutions, governments, supranational organisations and corporate clients around the globe. We offer a full spectrum of strategic advisory, financing and risk management solutions to help drive innovation and growth. For over 330 years, our commitment to shared success has been at the heart of what we do, because we are all at our best when we all progress. For further information about Barclays Investment Bank, please visit our website www.barclays.com/ib

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 21,686
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg-us.jpeg
KPMG US
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-investment-bank.jpeg
Barclays Investment Bank
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KPMG US
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Barclays Investment Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KPMG US in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Barclays Investment Bank in 2025.

Incident History — KPMG US (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KPMG US cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Barclays Investment Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Barclays Investment Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kpmg-us.jpeg
KPMG US
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/barclays-investment-bank.jpeg
Barclays Investment Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KPMG US company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Barclays Investment Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Barclays Investment Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KPMG US company.

In the current year, Barclays Investment Bank company and KPMG US company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank company nor KPMG US company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank company nor KPMG US company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Barclays Investment Bank company nor KPMG US company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KPMG US company nor Barclays Investment Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KPMG US company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Barclays Investment Bank company.

KPMG US company employs more people globally than Barclays Investment Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KPMG US nor Barclays Investment Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References