Comparison Overview

Kotchen & Low LLP

VS

Cardinal Intellectual Property

Kotchen & Low LLP

1918 New Hampshire Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20009, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Kotchen & Low LLP is a litigation boutique that focuses on commercial litigation, employment discrimination, antitrust, class actions, and patent infringement litigation. Based in Washington, D.C., the firm serves as lead counsel in some of the largest and most complex lawsuits across the country involving up to billions of dollars in damages. Daniel Kotchen and Daniel Low met at a top-tier law firm in Washington, D.C., where they worked closely together on complex commercial litigation matters. They were impressed with the quality of each other’s work, and admired each other’s enthusiasm for high-stakes litigation. After both left the firm for other experiences, they reunited to form Kotchen & Low LLP with the goal of providing clients with the highest caliber legal representation with greater efficiency than other law firms.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cardinal Intellectual Property

1603 Orrington Ave., Evanston, IL, 60201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Cardinal IP is a global leader in patent and trademark research, and a provider of software services for intellectual property management. Our team of research professionals is 100% U.S. based and consists of IP attorneys, PhDs, patent agents, former patent examiners, and technical advisors. As the leading IP services company in the United States, the USPTO selected Cardinal to conduct their PCT searches and prepare preliminary opinions across all subject categories. Our technology solutions for intellectual property management include Invention Disclosure Processing, Docketing, E-Discovery, and Competitive Monitoring. Our technology platforms incorporate rigorous security and data protection standards, and we maintain confidentiality using the same diligence and procedures as a law firm. We do not outsource our software or research services, enabling the company to maintain the highest standards of quality, confidentiality and accountability.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 157
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kotchen-&-low-llp.jpeg
Kotchen & Low LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cardinal-intellectual-property.jpeg
Cardinal Intellectual Property
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kotchen & Low LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cardinal Intellectual Property
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kotchen & Low LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cardinal Intellectual Property in 2025.

Incident History — Kotchen & Low LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kotchen & Low LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cardinal Intellectual Property (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cardinal Intellectual Property cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kotchen-&-low-llp.jpeg
Kotchen & Low LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cardinal-intellectual-property.jpeg
Cardinal Intellectual Property
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cardinal Intellectual Property company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kotchen & Low LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cardinal Intellectual Property company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kotchen & Low LLP company.

In the current year, Cardinal Intellectual Property company and Kotchen & Low LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cardinal Intellectual Property company nor Kotchen & Low LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cardinal Intellectual Property company nor Kotchen & Low LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cardinal Intellectual Property company nor Kotchen & Low LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP company nor Cardinal Intellectual Property company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cardinal Intellectual Property company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kotchen & Low LLP company.

Cardinal Intellectual Property company employs more people globally than Kotchen & Low LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kotchen & Low LLP nor Cardinal Intellectual Property holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X