Comparison Overview

Korn Ferry

VS

Elior Group

Korn Ferry

1900 Avenue of The Stars, Suite 2600, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90067
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Korn Ferry is a global consulting firm that powers performance. We unlock the potential in your people and unleash transformation across your business—synchronizing strategy, operations, and talent to accelerate performance, fuel growth, and inspire a legacy of change. That’s why the world’s most forward-thinking companies across every major industry turn to us—for a shared commitment to lasting impact and the bold ambition to Be More Than.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 18,756
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Elior Group

Tour Egée, Paris La Défense Cedex, undefined, 92032, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 750 and 799

Elior Group, one of the world's leading operators in contract catering and support services, has become a benchmark player in the business & industry, education and healthcare. Operating in 5 countries, Elior Group is a leader in its main markets, in Europe and North America. Our missions are to earn our guests’ trust, every day, by serving delicious, healthy and eco-friendly meals, and to provide excellent services at the locations of our customers and to those occupying them. Our ambition is to reinvent our business as a social caterer so that we can respond effectively to three major concerns of our guests: ▶ Is what I eat healthy and tasty, and is it good for me? ▶ Will eating also be a pleasurable opportunity for togetherness, and will it be good for us? ▶ Will the impact of what I eat be good for everyone? Key figures: ▶ 3 million guests per day ▶ 5 countries ▶ 97,000 employees ▶ €4,45 billion in revenue ▶ 20,250 restaurants and points of sale ▶ 2,400 sites managed by Elior Services

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25,749
Subsidiaries: 24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kornferry.jpeg
Korn Ferry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elior-group.jpeg
Elior Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Korn Ferry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Elior Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Korn Ferry in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elior Group in 2025.

Incident History — Korn Ferry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Korn Ferry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Elior Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elior Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kornferry.jpeg
Korn Ferry
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2012
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elior-group.jpeg
Elior Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Korn Ferry company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Elior Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Korn Ferry company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Elior Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Elior Group company and Korn Ferry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Elior Group company nor Korn Ferry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Korn Ferry company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Elior Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Elior Group company nor Korn Ferry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Korn Ferry company nor Elior Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Elior Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Korn Ferry company.

Elior Group company employs more people globally than Korn Ferry company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Korn Ferry nor Elior Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X