Comparison Overview

kor group

VS

Morgan and Company

kor group

undefined, Boston, MA, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Women-owned, Boston-based, brand strategy, design and web firm kor group has a proud and distinguished track record of helping clients fine-tune the messages they share with stakeholders, enhance their brand position, and generate impressive, quantifiable results. Our work focuses on listening closely and sympathetically, addressing clients’ issues and opportunities with considerable insight, and always striving to deliver unique and intriguing solutions to their communications requirements.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Morgan and Company

1430 W Broadway Rd, Tempe, Arizona, 85282, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Since 1982, we have been providing graphic design solutions that are both thoughtful and well-executed for companies that range from Fortune 500 level to individual start-ups. It is our privilege to offer our creative thinking in support of our clients'​ marketing success. We have a particularly high degree of expertise in the telecommunications, credit union, elder housing, commercial real estate, legal, and home health and medical testing fields, plus years of experience with many other industries.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kor-group.jpeg
kor group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-and-company.jpeg
Morgan and Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
kor group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morgan and Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for kor group in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morgan and Company in 2025.

Incident History — kor group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

kor group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morgan and Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morgan and Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kor-group.jpeg
kor group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morgan-and-company.jpeg
Morgan and Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Morgan and Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to kor group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Morgan and Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to kor group company.

In the current year, Morgan and Company company and kor group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morgan and Company company nor kor group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morgan and Company company nor kor group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morgan and Company company nor kor group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither kor group company nor Morgan and Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither kor group company nor Morgan and Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

kor group company employs more people globally than Morgan and Company company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither kor group nor Morgan and Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X