Comparison Overview

Kootenai Health

VS

GE HealthCare

Kootenai Health

2003 Kootenai Health Way, Coeur d'Alene, ID, US, 83814
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 600 and 649

As a regional medical referral center, Kootenai Health (formerly Kootenai Medical Center) provides a comprehensive range of medical services to patients throughout the Inland Northwest. Kootenai Health’s main hospital, located in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, features a capacity of 381 beds. We have more than 200 employed providers across 25+ clinical specialties from family medicine, cardiology, orthopedics, surgery and more. Kootenai Health repeatedly earns national recognition for safety and is a Magnet nursing facility. We look forward to partnering with you in your health care and career journey.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 2,107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

GE HealthCare

-, None, Chicago, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 800 and 849

Every day millions of people feel the impact of our intelligent devices, advanced analytics and artificial intelligence. As a leading global medical technology and digital solutions innovator, GE HealthCare enables clinicians to make faster, more informed decisions through intelligent devices, data analytics, applications and services, supported by its Edison intelligence platform. With over 100 years of healthcare industry experience and around 50,000 employees globally, the company operates at the center of an ecosystem working toward precision health, digitizing healthcare, helping drive productivity and improve outcomes for patients, providers, health systems and researchers around the world. We embrace a culture of respect, transparency, integrity and diversity and we work to create a world where healthcare has no limits.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 57,635
Subsidiaries: 21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kootenai-health.jpeg
Kootenai Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gehealthcare.jpeg
GE HealthCare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kootenai Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GE HealthCare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kootenai Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GE HealthCare in 2025.

Incident History — Kootenai Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kootenai Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GE HealthCare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GE HealthCare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kootenai-health.jpeg
Kootenai Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Fraud, Identity Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gehealthcare.jpeg
GE HealthCare
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GE HealthCare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kootenai Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kootenai Health company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GE HealthCare company has not reported any.

In the current year, GE HealthCare company and Kootenai Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Kootenai Health company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while GE HealthCare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kootenai Health company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other GE HealthCare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GE HealthCare company nor Kootenai Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kootenai Health company nor GE HealthCare company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GE HealthCare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kootenai Health company.

GE HealthCare company employs more people globally than Kootenai Health company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kootenai Health nor GE HealthCare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X