Comparison Overview

Komplot Repro Rotterdam

VS

Lake City Printing

Komplot Repro Rotterdam

Beursplein, Rotterdam, 3011AA, NL
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Repro Servicebedrijf. Voor al uw plot, print, kopieer en presentatiewerk. komPLOT is opgericht in 1987. Het doel van de onderneming was toen: "Het dupliceren van bouwtekeningen"​, in die tijd nog met behulp van de lichtdrukmachine. Vanaf de eerste dag is komPLOT een innovatieve onderneming geweest die altijd een stap vooruit durft te denken en dagelijks bezig was en is met het vernieuwen van productie processen. Zo stond de eerste hogesnelheidsplotter van Nederland in ons bedrijf. Aangezien de markt steeds verandert, veranderen onze producten en diensten voortdurend mee. Ondanks het feit dat komPLOT zich altijd aan veranderende omstandigheden heeft aanpast heeft zij tegelijkertijd haar karakteristieke eigenschappen, zoals service, klantgerichtheid en een hoge kwaliteit, weten te behouden. Zo ontstaat altijd een nieuw komPLOT dat voortborduurt op wat goed was in het verleden.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lake City Printing

1723 W Sale Rd, Lake Charles, Louisiana, US, 70605
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Lake City Printing was started in 1977 by Peter Romero. Today LCP utilizes the latest digital equipment along with sheet feed presses and wide format printers. We are proud to use such brands as Kodak, Roland, Screen, Heidelberg, MBO, Polar, and Duplo. Our state-of-the-art equipment allows us to provide our clients with high-quality products faster and less-expensively than our competition. LCP is located in Lake Charles, LA and serves the state of Louisiana and east Texas region. We provide the business community with the following services: ►Printing ►Direct Mail ►Promotional Items ►Graphic Design ►Email Marketing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/komplot.jpeg
Komplot Repro Rotterdam
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-city-printing.jpeg
Lake City Printing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Komplot Repro Rotterdam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lake City Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Komplot Repro Rotterdam in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lake City Printing in 2025.

Incident History — Komplot Repro Rotterdam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Komplot Repro Rotterdam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lake City Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lake City Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/komplot.jpeg
Komplot Repro Rotterdam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lake-city-printing.jpeg
Lake City Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Komplot Repro Rotterdam company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lake City Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lake City Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Komplot Repro Rotterdam company.

In the current year, Lake City Printing company and Komplot Repro Rotterdam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lake City Printing company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lake City Printing company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lake City Printing company nor Komplot Repro Rotterdam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam company nor Lake City Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam company nor Lake City Printing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Lake City Printing company employs more people globally than Komplot Repro Rotterdam company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Komplot Repro Rotterdam nor Lake City Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L