Comparison Overview

Kolorcraft Group

VS

Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP)

Kolorcraft Group

Milner Way, Ossett, WF5 9JE, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We've been beautifully crafting in-store marketing and helping brands grow for over 40 years. We're one of the largest POS producers in the UK, with over 200 people across our five divisions, working with a variety of big name high street retailers and international brands. We manage the whole POS process, from creative, print production, and fulfillment, all the way through to installation. We’re full to the brim with innovative solutions and our end2end online platform simplifies and automates key marketing tasks. With end2end you can say goodbye to unnecessary holdups and say hello to a reactive solution for company-wide marketing.. We’re proud of our Yorkshire roots and we love a challenge, enjoying nothing more than helping our customers to overcome theirs. Here at Kolocraft, the bottom line is that we enjoy what we do. We’re passionate and strive for excellence every single time so, whatever your POS needs, you're in safe hands!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 90
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP)

PO Box 535, None, Sayville, New York, US, 11782
Last Update: 2025-12-13
Between 750 and 799

The Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) is the leading comprehensive sustainability certification organization for print facilities. Those facilities achieving certification meet high standards of sustainability performance facility-wide with the smallest possible environmental footprint. SGP advocates best practices and innovation through a multi-attribute, publicly vetted, third party certification that encourages reduction of environmental impact while increasing social responsibility.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kolorcraft-group-ltd..jpeg
Kolorcraft Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sustainable-green-printing-partnership-sgp-.jpeg
Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kolorcraft Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kolorcraft Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) in 2025.

Incident History — Kolorcraft Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kolorcraft Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kolorcraft-group-ltd..jpeg
Kolorcraft Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sustainable-green-printing-partnership-sgp-.jpeg
Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kolorcraft Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kolorcraft Group company.

In the current year, Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company and Kolorcraft Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company nor Kolorcraft Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company nor Kolorcraft Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company nor Kolorcraft Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kolorcraft Group company nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kolorcraft Group company nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kolorcraft Group company employs more people globally than Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kolorcraft Group nor Sustainable Green Printing Partnership (SGP) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N