Comparison Overview

KOKUYO

VS

Business Interiors (Australia)

KOKUYO

1-8-35 Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108-8710,, None, Tokyo, None, JP, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Kokuyo, a leading supplier of office furniture and stationery in Japan is actively expanding its brand and products to the global workplace. Founded in 1905, Kokuyo is renowned for its exceptional product quality, as well as its continuous research and development of innovative concepts for workspaces. Bringing sustainable development to a corporation is one of the major drivers in Kokuyo policy. As a socially responsible corporation, Kokuyo shows great environmental awareness in production, delivery, and working environment, which has shaped Kokuyo to be a reliable brand name in Japan. Our long history is our strength and will contribute to the forging of our future.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 321
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Business Interiors (Australia)

163 O'Riordan Street, Mascot, NSW, 2020, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

We help create dynamic commercial spaces with intelligent furniture solutions. Over three decades we have built a strong reputation in the design industry, delivering furniture solutions across Australia. We work in a range of sectors including commercial, health, government and education, and provide furniture for both small and large projects. Our approach towards supplying furniture is consciously informed by the way a space will be occupied and the desired experience intended. Whether it is an office, aged-care facility or classroom we aim to increase productivity and efficiency, and transform these spaces into meaningful experiences.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kokuyo-international-asia-co-ltd-.jpeg
KOKUYO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-interiors-by-staples-australia-.jpeg
Business Interiors (Australia)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KOKUYO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Business Interiors (Australia)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KOKUYO in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Business Interiors (Australia) in 2025.

Incident History — KOKUYO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KOKUYO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Business Interiors (Australia) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Business Interiors (Australia) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kokuyo-international-asia-co-ltd-.jpeg
KOKUYO
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/business-interiors-by-staples-australia-.jpeg
Business Interiors (Australia)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KOKUYO company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Business Interiors (Australia) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Business Interiors (Australia) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KOKUYO company.

In the current year, Business Interiors (Australia) company and KOKUYO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Business Interiors (Australia) company nor KOKUYO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Business Interiors (Australia) company nor KOKUYO company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Business Interiors (Australia) company nor KOKUYO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KOKUYO company nor Business Interiors (Australia) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KOKUYO company nor Business Interiors (Australia) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

KOKUYO company employs more people globally than Business Interiors (Australia) company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KOKUYO nor Business Interiors (Australia) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.