Comparison Overview

KMH Editing

VS

Rowman & Littlefield International

KMH Editing

None, None, Minneapolis, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

KMH Editing provides freelance book editing services for publishers and writers. Owner Kellie M. Hultgren draws on her decade of in-house experience to deliver meticulous, on-deadline copy editing, proofreading, and substantive editing, as well as coaching and developmental editing . Current clients include Lerner Publishing Group/Carolrhoda Books, Quayside Publishing Group, the University of Notre Dame Press, and Yoyo Books; self-publishers such as Beaver's Pond Press, Smith House Press, and Wise Ink Publishing; and individual and corporate authors. Specialties include children's books and YA (fiction and nonfiction), teen fiction and New Adult, general fiction (especially science fiction, fantasy, thrillers, and action/adventure), essays, social and cultural history, and memoir.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Rowman & Littlefield International

6 Tinworth Street, London, England, SE11 5AL, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Winner of the Nick Robinson Newcomer Award, Independent Publishers Guild Awards 2015. Shortlisted for Academic, Educational and Professional Publisher of the Year at the British Book Awards 2019. Rowman & Littlefield International is an independent, interdisciplinary publisher in the Humanities & Social Sciences. We are committed to bringing incisive modern scholarship to a global readership in multiple formats. We firmly believe in the value of publishing cutting-edge research for a scholarly audience. RLI was established in November 2012, in collaboration with the Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group in Washington DC. We are a member of the Independent Publishers Guild and the Publishers Association.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmh-editing.jpeg
KMH Editing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowman-&-littlefield-international.jpeg
Rowman & Littlefield International
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KMH Editing
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rowman & Littlefield International
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KMH Editing in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rowman & Littlefield International in 2025.

Incident History — KMH Editing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KMH Editing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rowman & Littlefield International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rowman & Littlefield International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kmh-editing.jpeg
KMH Editing
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2013
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rowman-&-littlefield-international.jpeg
Rowman & Littlefield International
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rowman & Littlefield International company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KMH Editing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

KMH Editing company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rowman & Littlefield International company has not reported any.

In the current year, Rowman & Littlefield International company and KMH Editing company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rowman & Littlefield International company nor KMH Editing company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

KMH Editing company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Rowman & Littlefield International company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Rowman & Littlefield International company nor KMH Editing company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KMH Editing company nor Rowman & Littlefield International company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KMH Editing company nor Rowman & Littlefield International company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rowman & Littlefield International company employs more people globally than KMH Editing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KMH Editing nor Rowman & Littlefield International holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.