Comparison Overview

Kjarninn

VS

Eurekadoc

Kjarninn

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, IS
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.kjarninn.is

Kjarninn Media is Iceland's fastest growing new media company. Our main ambition is to deliver deep dive perspective and quality news to our readers. Kjarninn was officially established on June 1, 2013. It focuses on the quality and depth of its coverage of the most pressing issues and current affairs, both in Iceland and internationally. Kjarninn is first and foremost a content creator, which utilizes the digital ways offered to bring content to readers and consumers. For international readers Kjarninn offers a weekly newsletter in English. The Weekly Report (www.kjarninn.is/weekly) is a newsletter especially designed to help international decision makers keep track of current affairs in Iceland. Its primary focus is on business, economics and politics. Every Friday you will get a comprehensive report delivered to your inbox. For further information and enquiries please contact Kjarninn Media at [email protected] Visit www.kjarninn.is and follow us on Twitter @Kjarninn_is

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Eurekadoc

Kemp House, London, undefined, EC1V 2NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eurekadoc.com

Eurekadoc specialises in producing diverse medical career guides for Doctors. We meticulously research the very best 'niche' professions and even go undercover to obtain expert advice, and the insider tips & tricks that will help you to succeed. Written by doctors, for doctors, you can be certain we have your best interests at heart. When you read our career guides, we want you to say EUREKA!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kjarninn.jpeg
Kjarninn
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurekadoc-publishing.jpeg
Eurekadoc
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kjarninn
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eurekadoc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kjarninn in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eurekadoc in 2025.

Incident History — Kjarninn (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kjarninn cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eurekadoc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eurekadoc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kjarninn.jpeg
Kjarninn
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eurekadoc-publishing.jpeg
Eurekadoc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eurekadoc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kjarninn company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eurekadoc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kjarninn company.

In the current year, Eurekadoc company and Kjarninn company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eurekadoc company nor Kjarninn company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eurekadoc company nor Kjarninn company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eurekadoc company nor Kjarninn company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kjarninn company nor Eurekadoc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kjarninn company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Eurekadoc company.

Both Kjarninn company and Eurekadoc company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kjarninn nor Eurekadoc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References