Comparison Overview

Kitchener Public Library

VS

State Library Of Ohio

Kitchener Public Library

85 Queen St N, Kitchener, ON, N2H 2H1, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

We welcome our community to engaging spaces where people connect, ideas flourish, and lives are transformed. "We know that today’s libraries are not just places for consuming content, but also for creating it. We also recognize that many in our community lack access to the tools needed to bring their dreams to life. Providing the latest in technology and learning opportunities is an important part of our new strategic plan, and to our ongoing commitment of ensuring digital literacy is a possibility for everyone." Mary Chevreau, CEO, Kitchener Public Library

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 127
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

State Library Of Ohio

274 E 1st Ave, Columbus, OH, 43201, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

STATE LIBRARY OF OHIO is a state agency that serves state government, all types of libraries and residents. The vision of the State Library of Ohio is a Smarter Ohio where every Ohioan can access the necessary resources to be engaged citizens, excel at their jobs, participate in the workforce, and pursue their passions and interests.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kitchener-public-library.jpeg
Kitchener Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-library-of-ohio.jpeg
State Library Of Ohio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kitchener Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
State Library Of Ohio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kitchener Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State Library Of Ohio in 2025.

Incident History — Kitchener Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kitchener Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — State Library Of Ohio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State Library Of Ohio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kitchener-public-library.jpeg
Kitchener Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/state-library-of-ohio.jpeg
State Library Of Ohio
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kitchener Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to State Library Of Ohio company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

State Library Of Ohio company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Kitchener Public Library company has not reported any.

In the current year, State Library Of Ohio company and Kitchener Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither State Library Of Ohio company nor Kitchener Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

State Library Of Ohio company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Kitchener Public Library company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither State Library Of Ohio company nor Kitchener Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kitchener Public Library company nor State Library Of Ohio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

State Library Of Ohio company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kitchener Public Library company.

Kitchener Public Library company employs more people globally than State Library Of Ohio company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kitchener Public Library nor State Library Of Ohio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H