Comparison Overview

Kirin International Holding, Inc.

VS

Odebrecht

Kirin International Holding, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Kirin International Holding, Inc., founded in 2009, is a comprehensive investment company listed on the U.S. capital market on March 5, 2011 (Stock code: KIRI). Kirin International Holding, Inc is a global investment company with leading market positions in real estate development, brand management, and investment. Kirin has 6 subsidiaries: Brookhollow Lake LLC, Greenfield International Corporation, Archway Development Group LLC, Kirin Hopkins International LLC, Hopkins Kirin Facilities Group LLC, and Newport Properties Development LLC. Kirin International has a presence in China and USA with headquarters in Santa Ana, USA. For more information, visit www.cathaykylin.com

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 11-50
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Odebrecht

Av. Luís Viana, 2841 Paralela Salvador, BA 41730-900, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on five continents. As part of their entrepreneurial responsibility while serving clients and local communities, they contribute to the development of economically prosperous, socially just, environmentally sustainable, politically inclusive and culturally rich societies and countries.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kirin-international-holding-inc-.jpeg
Kirin International Holding, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/odebrecht.jpeg
Odebrecht
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kirin International Holding, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Odebrecht
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kirin International Holding, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Odebrecht in 2025.

Incident History — Kirin International Holding, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kirin International Holding, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Odebrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odebrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kirin-international-holding-inc-.jpeg
Kirin International Holding, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/odebrecht.jpeg
Odebrecht
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Odebrecht company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kirin International Holding, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Odebrecht company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kirin International Holding, Inc. company.

In the current year, Odebrecht company and Kirin International Holding, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Kirin International Holding, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Kirin International Holding, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Kirin International Holding, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. company nor Odebrecht company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. company nor Odebrecht company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kirin International Holding, Inc. nor Odebrecht holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H