Comparison Overview

Kintetsu World Express

VS

DHL Express

Kintetsu World Express

Konan, Minato Ku (shinagawa), 24 Fl, Shinagawa Intercity Tower A, 2-15-1, Tokyo, Minato-ku, JP, 108-6024
Last Update: 2025-12-18
Between 600 and 649

As a leading provider of Air Freight, Ocean Freight, Customs Brokerage, Surface Logistics and Distribution (3PL) services KWE has taken pride in the delivery of your cargo to any market around the world. Today, with terminal and office locations in virtually every major city nationwide, we are ranked among the country's top ten International Freight Forwarders. Our commitment to our customers remains, quite simply, to offer the highest level of products and services available globally. We are committed to providing our customers with logistics solutions that will help them maintain a competitive edge.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 5,578
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

DHL Express

Fritz-Erler-Strasse 5, Bonn, NRW, 53113, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Leading the way in international logistics across an unparalleled network of 220 countries and territories. With decades of experience, we’re your ideal partner for flexible, sustainable shipping to support your growing business and help you expand into new markets. DHL website terms and conditions and a statement on DHL’s commitment to user privacy on its websites can be found here: www.dhl.com/en/legal Our international network covers more than 220 countries and territories around the globe and includes decades of shipping, logistics, and eCommerce experience. DHL website terms and conditions and a statement on DHL’s commitment to user privacy on its websites can be found here: www.dhl.com/en/legal

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 44,576
Subsidiaries: 27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kintetsu-world-express.jpeg
Kintetsu World Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhlexpress.jpeg
DHL Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kintetsu World Express
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DHL Express
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

Kintetsu World Express has 16.67% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DHL Express in 2025.

Incident History — Kintetsu World Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kintetsu World Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DHL Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DHL Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kintetsu-world-express.jpeg
Kintetsu World Express
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dhlexpress.jpeg
DHL Express
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DHL Express company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kintetsu World Express company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kintetsu World Express company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DHL Express company has not reported any.

In the current year, Kintetsu World Express company has reported more cyber incidents than DHL Express company.

Kintetsu World Express company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while DHL Express company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither DHL Express company nor Kintetsu World Express company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither DHL Express company nor Kintetsu World Express company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kintetsu World Express company nor DHL Express company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

DHL Express company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kintetsu World Express company.

DHL Express company employs more people globally than Kintetsu World Express company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kintetsu World Express nor DHL Express holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N