Comparison Overview

Kintech

VS

JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd

Kintech

Copenhagen Road, Sutton Fields Industrial Estate, Hull, undefined, HU7 0QX, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Kintech Ltd is one of the leading manufacturers and suppliers of standard and bespoke metal products to the caravan, healthcare, and automotive industries, working with some of the largest manufacturers in the UK. With over 40 years’ industry experience, we design and manufacture quality products to the highest of standards from our factory in Hull. Our specialist in-house designers and skilled engineers work as a team with our customers to design and manufacture products that will precisely meet their requirements. We can take a product concept or an idea from a client and turn this into a fully specified engineering drawing ready for manufacture. Visit our website to find out how we can help you!

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd

undefined, undefined, undefined, 3175, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

JDN MONOCRANE design, manufacture install and distributes a completely comprehensive range of cranes, electric hoists, materials handling and warehousing systems. We also provide design support and componentry to other crane makers throughout the Australasian-Pacific region. Our company’s strengths lie in our ability to combine the most reliable componentry with advanced engineering and programming skills. This provides our clients with top performance installations at very competitive prices. JDN MONOCRANE have been setting new standards in crane performance technology, crane design, crane manufacture and crane service. Today, with extensive resources, a commitment to quality principles and a dedication to customer satisfaction, we are providing innovative answers for clients throughout the Asia-Pacific region

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 57
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kintech.co.uk.jpeg
Kintech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jdn-monocrane-pty-ltd.jpeg
JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kintech
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kintech in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — Kintech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kintech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kintech.co.uk.jpeg
Kintech
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jdn-monocrane-pty-ltd.jpeg
JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kintech company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kintech company.

In the current year, JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company and Kintech company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company nor Kintech company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company nor Kintech company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company nor Kintech company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kintech company nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kintech company nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than Kintech company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kintech nor JDN Monocrane Pty Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H