Comparison Overview

King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys

VS

IPR FIRM

King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys

Unit No. 14, DLF Tower A, Jasola, New Delhi, Delhi, 110025, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

King Stubb & Kasiva is a Corporate Law Firm in India that has established teams in every practice area to ensure our services meet the most exact standards. They have their offices in Bangalore, Chennai, New Delhi, Mumbai, Kochi, Kolkata & Pune. Their Key Practices include Corporate M&A, Private Equity & Venture Capital, Banking & Finance, Real Estate, Dispute Resolution (Arbitration & Litigation), Insolvency, Regulatory and Labour & Employment matters. The Firm also has dedicated practices surrounding Capital Markets, Competition and Anti-trust, Environmental, Food, Information Technology, Infrastructure & Project Finance, IPR, Investment, Legal Metrology, Litigation, Media Law and Tax. Its industry focus encompasses blockchain & cryptos, e-commerce, defense, fintech, healthcare & Pharmaceuticals, power & energy, telecom, media and telecommunications, transport & logistics, trusts, charities and not-for-profit and white-collar crime. Over the last several years, King Stubb & Kasiva (KSK) – Advocates and Attorneys has developed a niche in mid-market M&A, litigation and disputes resolution, employment and labor, banking and finance, IT, ecommerce and emerging technology practices. The firm’s clients include large and medium Indian and foreign businesses, multinational corporations, and Fortune 500 companies. The firm advises ministries, government authorities, and public sector undertakings. KSK also assists and advises start-ups in different industry sectors including e-commerce, fin-tech, genomics, defense, drugs & cosmetics, ed-tech, med-tech, news & media aggregation, logistics, blockchain, airports, mining, green energy, power & energy, real estate, engineering & manufacturing, pharmacy wholesale & retail distribution, F&B, fashion & clothing, fitness.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 207
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IPR FIRM

IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

ITAG Business Solutions Ltd. is a Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) in the domain of all IP services, being Patent, Trademark, Design, Copy Rights, Trade Secrets and IP management services. ITAG is a total solution provider to all IP problems for inventions and identification to filing, prosecution, enforcement, litigation support and commercialization. ITAG implies Innovation Technology Advancement Gateway. We help drafting of licensing agreement, technology transfer and meet the gap between Invention and Investment. We bring together Research Institutions and the Industry.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingstubbkasiva.jpeg
King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
IPR FIRM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IPR FIRM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPR FIRM in 2025.

Incident History — King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IPR FIRM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPR FIRM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingstubbkasiva.jpeg
King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
IPR FIRM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IPR FIRM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IPR FIRM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company.

In the current year, IPR FIRM company and King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IPR FIRM company nor King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IPR FIRM company nor King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IPR FIRM company nor King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company nor IPR FIRM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company nor IPR FIRM company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys company employs more people globally than IPR FIRM company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither King Stubb & Kasiva, Advocates & Attorneys nor IPR FIRM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X