Comparison Overview

Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil

VS

Agency for Strategic Initiatives

Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil

SES, Quadra 801, Lote 05, Brasília, DF, 70405-900, BR
Last Update: 2025-12-10

Welcome to the official page of the diplomatic representation of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil. Our diplomatic network consists of the Embassy in Brasília, the Consulate General in São Paulo and the Consulate General in Rio the Janeiro. We also have two Netherlands Business Support Offices in Belo Horizonte and Porto Alegre, and Honorary Consulates in Belém, Curitiba, Fortaleza, Manaus, Natal, Porto Alegre, Recife, Salvador, Santos, and Vila Velha. The Embassy represents, promotes and protects the interests of the government of the Netherlands, as well as those of Dutch nationals in Brazil. Furthermore, the Economic Team of the Embassy deals with Economy, Trade, Investment, Innovation and Agriculture between the Netherlands and Brazil, and assists Dutch companies looking for market opportunities.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Agency for Strategic Initiatives

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Агентство стратегических инициатив по продвижению новых проектов создано в целях поддержки уникальных общественно значимых проектов и инициатив среднего предпринимательства, содействия профессиональной мобильности и поддержки молодых профессиональных коллективов в социальной сфере. Агентство создано Правительством Российской Федерации в форме автономной некоммерческой организации. Работа Агентства осуществляется по трем основным направления: Новый бизнес, Молодые профессионалы, Социальные проекты.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingdom-of-the-netherlands-in-brazil.jpeg
Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agency-for-strategic-initiatives.jpeg
Agency for Strategic Initiatives
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Agency for Strategic Initiatives
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Agency for Strategic Initiatives in 2025.

Incident History — Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Agency for Strategic Initiatives (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Agency for Strategic Initiatives cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kingdom-of-the-netherlands-in-brazil.jpeg
Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/agency-for-strategic-initiatives.jpeg
Agency for Strategic Initiatives
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Agency for Strategic Initiatives company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Agency for Strategic Initiatives company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company.

In the current year, Agency for Strategic Initiatives company and Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Agency for Strategic Initiatives company nor Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Agency for Strategic Initiatives company nor Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Agency for Strategic Initiatives company nor Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil company employs more people globally than Agency for Strategic Initiatives company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kingdom of the Netherlands in Brazil nor Agency for Strategic Initiatives holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N