Comparison Overview

King & Fisher

VS

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd

King & Fisher

Three Galleria Tower, Dallas, Texas, 75240, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

King & Fisher is a unique law firm focused exclusively on outsourcing, technology transactions, and business contracts. Our partners each have more than 20 years of experience handling technology, outsourcing and other commercial transactions for many of the world’s leading technology companies and their customers, including Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Facebook, Quicken Loans, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Wal-Mart, Xerox, CNET, American Airlines, AT&T, Samsung, Verizon Wireless, Hewlett-Packard, Sprint, Salesforce.com, Match.com, eBay, Rackspace, and DuPont, just to name a few. We work with all types of clients, from start-ups, to established small and medium-sized companies, to Fortune 10 companies. We understand the need to balance the legal and business demands and risks to get a deal done. Representative types of transactions include Software Licenses, Software as a Service (SaaS) and other Cloud Contracts, Outsourcing Agreements (IT and BPO), Service Levels, Development Agreements, Implementation Agreements, Integration Agreements, Hardware Acquisition, Website Agreements, Manufacturing Agreements, Nondisclosure Agreements, Copyrights, Big Data, Advertising, Trademarks, Disaster Recovery / Business Continuity, Service Agreements, Privacy Issues, Mobile App Agreements, Open Source Issues, and Trade Secrets.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd

1 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L3 9HF, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd provide legal support, assistance and advice to Litigants in Person, Businesses and Solicitors. Our services to solicitors including costs drafting and advocacy. We are able to draft and negotiate Bills of Costs for various types of case including Personal Injury, Industrial Disease, Commercial Claims, Professional Deputies and other Civil Litigation cases. We can also provide Advocacy support and services including Infant Approval Hearings, Possession Hearings and Costs Hearings.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-fisher.jpeg
King & Fisher
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-collar-legal-and-admin-ltd.jpeg
White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
King & Fisher
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King & Fisher in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — King & Fisher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King & Fisher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-fisher.jpeg
King & Fisher
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/white-collar-legal-and-admin-ltd.jpeg
White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd
Incidents

FAQ

King & Fisher company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to King & Fisher company.

In the current year, White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company and King & Fisher company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company nor King & Fisher company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company nor King & Fisher company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company nor King & Fisher company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither King & Fisher company nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither King & Fisher company nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

King & Fisher company employs more people globally than White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither King & Fisher nor White Collar (Legal and Admin) Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X