Comparison Overview

King Cunningham, LLC

VS

Baron Law

King Cunningham, LLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

King Cunningham, LLC is a law firm located in North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, serving and advising clients of all sizes in virtually all matters relating to real property and finance. King Cunningham provides a wealth of experience to serve real estate developers, brokers, lenders and purchasers through all aspects of real estate and business transactions. Founded in 2012 by Jeffrey W. King and W. Joseph Cunningham, the firm focuses primarily on commercial and residential real estate related matters. With over fifteen years’ experience in development of both single family neighborhoods and high-rise condominium development, King Cunningham offers comprehensive services for the real estate developer from commencement of a project through sellout and post-construction operations. The attorneys at King Cunningham have represented developers in some of the largest condominium development projects on the grand strand, including development of the Bay Watch Resort, Prince Resort at Cherry Grove Pier and Wyndham Ocean Drive in North Myrtle Beach, the Anderson Ocean Club and Carolinian Resort in Myrtle Beach. King Cunningham is well versed on the intricacies of timeshare development, homeowner association creation, condominium formation documentation and zoning law. The firm’s attorneys have provided counsel to landowners in the creation of numerous subdivisions, Planned Unit Development zoning districts, ordinance text amendments, variances, alley and street relocations, and other zoning and permitting petitions in Horry County, Myrtle Beach and North Myrtle Beach.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Baron Law

5005 Rockside Rd, Independence, Ohio, 44131, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Baron Law LLC is a Cleveland, Ohio law firm providing legal services in the areas of estate planning, medicaid planning, family and business law, and more. Do you need a Cleveland, Ohio attorney who will fight for your legal rights? Are you facing a difficult legal battle? Call an Ohio attorney at Baron Law where you will receive qualified counsel and seamless client service (216) 573-3723.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-cunningham-llc.jpeg
King Cunningham, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baron-law.jpeg
Baron Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
King Cunningham, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baron Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King Cunningham, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baron Law in 2025.

Incident History — King Cunningham, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King Cunningham, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baron Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baron Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-cunningham-llc.jpeg
King Cunningham, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baron-law.jpeg
Baron Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

King Cunningham, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Baron Law company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Baron Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to King Cunningham, LLC company.

In the current year, Baron Law company and King Cunningham, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baron Law company nor King Cunningham, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baron Law company nor King Cunningham, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baron Law company nor King Cunningham, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC company nor Baron Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC company nor Baron Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

King Cunningham, LLC company employs more people globally than Baron Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither King Cunningham, LLC nor Baron Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X