Comparison Overview

King County Bar Association

VS

elaw

King County Bar Association

1200 5th Avenue, Seattle, Washington, 98101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The King County Bar Association (KCBA) was founded in 1886 and incorporated in 1906 as a voluntary professional association. It serves a legal community of over 14,000 in the Seattle metropolitan area. Today the mission of KCBA is to promote and support a diverse and collegial membership; work with the judiciary to achieve excellence, equity, and accessibility in the administration of justice; and benefit the community through public service and engagement in public policy. The King County Bar Foundation (KCBF), a 501(c)(3) organization, was established in 1979. Its mission is to ensure access to the legal system and to encourage diversity in the legal profession. KCBF provides funding for legal services to low-income residents of King County through KCBA's Pro Bono Services and provides scholarships for minority law students at local law schools.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 107
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

elaw

201 Sussex St, Sydney, New South Wales, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-29
Between 750 and 799

elaw is Australia's premiere eLitigation consultancy with expertise in the management, analysis, eDiscovery and presentation of evidence. We offer assistance through the entire eLitigation lifecycle, from early case assessment through to eHearings: - Forensic collection - Early case assessment - Data processing - Workflow & advisory - Analytics & technology assisted review - eDiscovery - Pre-trial preparation - eHearings We empower litigators, corporates and government agencies to actively engage in eLitigation using effective, defensible and best practice strategies. Our dedicated team of lawyers, technologists, project managers and analysts work seamlessly to deliver best-fit solutions and unmatched service to clients across Australia and beyond. With top-down commitment to innovation, quality, continuous learning and value, we deliver on our promise to provide a great workplace experience and exceptional client solutions. Based in Australia, we support clients and matters of all sizes in Asia Pacific, the UK, Europe and North America. Our strong partnership with a range of market-leading technology providers including Relativity, Nuix and Delium gives us the power and flexibility to recommend and support the best solution for your needs. Whatever the solution, you can expect tailored workflows and methodologies paired with expert advice and exceptional support.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-county-bar-association.jpeg
King County Bar Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-law-international.jpeg
elaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
King County Bar Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
elaw
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for King County Bar Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for elaw in 2025.

Incident History — King County Bar Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

King County Bar Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — elaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

elaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/king-county-bar-association.jpeg
King County Bar Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/e-law-international.jpeg
elaw
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

King County Bar Association company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to elaw company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, elaw company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to King County Bar Association company.

In the current year, elaw company and King County Bar Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither elaw company nor King County Bar Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither elaw company nor King County Bar Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither elaw company nor King County Bar Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither King County Bar Association company nor elaw company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

King County Bar Association company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to elaw company.

King County Bar Association company employs more people globally than elaw company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds HIPAA certification.

Neither King County Bar Association nor elaw holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X