Comparison Overview

Kindred

VS

Medical University of South Carolina

Kindred

680 South Fourth Street, Louisville, KY, US, 40202
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Kindred’s mission is to help our patients reach their highest potential for health and healing with intensive medical and rehabilitative care through a compassionate patient experience. Kindred’s 61 long-term acute care hospitals (LTACHs), along with 18 community-based, short-term acute care hospital campuses from across the nation, became part of ScionHealth with its launch in December 2021. Cornerstone Healthcare Group joined the ScionHealth family of hospitals and hospital services in January 2023. In December 2021, Kindred Healthcare became a part of LifePoint Health, a leading healthcare company. As part of this transaction, LifePoint and Kindred also launched a new company, ScionHealth. Today, Kindred’s facilities are now part of either LifePoint or ScionHealth. Specifically, Kindred’s 61 long-term acute care hospitals – along with 18 community-based, short-term acute care hospital campuses from LifePoint – are now a part of ScionHealth.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,609
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Medical University of South Carolina

45 Courtenay Drive,, Charleston, sc, 29425, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

The Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) is a public institution of higher learning the purpose of which is to preserve and optimize human life in South Carolina and beyond. The university provides an interprofessional environment for learning and discovery through education of health care professionals and biomedical scientists, research in the health sciences and provision of comprehensive health care.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 14,577
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kindred-healthcare.jpeg
Kindred
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kindred
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Medical University of South Carolina
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kindred in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Medical University of South Carolina in 2025.

Incident History — Kindred (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kindred cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Medical University of South Carolina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Medical University of South Carolina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kindred-healthcare.jpeg
Kindred
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/medical-university-of-south-carolina.jpeg
Medical University of South Carolina
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kindred company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Medical University of South Carolina company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Medical University of South Carolina company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kindred company.

In the current year, Medical University of South Carolina company and Kindred company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor Kindred company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor Kindred company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Medical University of South Carolina company nor Kindred company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kindred company nor Medical University of South Carolina company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kindred company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Medical University of South Carolina company.

Medical University of South Carolina company employs more people globally than Kindred company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kindred nor Medical University of South Carolina holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N