Comparison Overview

Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A.

VS

Lavinsky Law

Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A.

56 W. Main St., 4th Floor, Newark, DE, 19702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. is Delaware's largest law firm dedicated to personal injury and workers' compensation. Since 1972, we have been committed to obtaining compensation for those injured as a result of an accident. If you or someone you know has suffered an injury or injuries as a result of an accident, we are Delaware personal injury attorneys who have handled auto accidents, work accidents, construction accidents, product liability cases, insurance claims, and wrongful death suits over the course of 50 years serving people in and around Delaware.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Lavinsky Law

12121 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, 90025, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Lavinsky Law is a distinguished law firm providing superior legal representation in the areas of Family Law and Civil Litigation to the Los Angeles community. When faced with uncertainties in the most critical areas of life, Lavinsky Law provides the advocacy necessary to protect your family and your finances. We aggressively protect our clients’ rights and obtain favorable results through litigation or alternative resolution such as mediation. Alexandra Lavinsky’s strong litigation background, knowledge, and understanding of the law enables her to successfully handle all family law situations from high asset property division to complex child custody matters. She has both the experience and competency to tell you where you stand and the likely outcome of your legal dispute. She is known in the legal community as a fighter who protects her clients’ rights and works tirelessly on behalf of her clients. She prides herself on the quality of her work and the personal service she provides to each and every client. She empowers her clients through knowledge so that they too understand the legal process in which they are or may become involved. Through this understanding, the client can have meaningful input in determining the best course of action for her/his particular case.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimmel-carter-roman-&-peltz-p-a-.jpeg
Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavinsky-law.jpeg
Lavinsky Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lavinsky Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lavinsky Law in 2025.

Incident History — Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lavinsky Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lavinsky Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kimmel-carter-roman-&-peltz-p-a-.jpeg
Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lavinsky-law.jpeg
Lavinsky Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lavinsky Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Lavinsky Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company.

In the current year, Lavinsky Law company and Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lavinsky Law company nor Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lavinsky Law company nor Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lavinsky Law company nor Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company nor Lavinsky Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company nor Lavinsky Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. company employs more people globally than Lavinsky Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kimmel, Carter, Roman, Peltz & O'Neill, P.A. nor Lavinsky Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X