Comparison Overview

Kigen

VS

VEON

Kigen

Kigen Ltd, c/o Mishcon de Reya, Four Station Square,, Cambridge, England, GB, CB1 2GE
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 750 and 799

At Kigen, we are making the future of securing connectivity simple. As simple as can be. Together with our partners and customers, we are unlocking new opportunities as (integrated) eSIM becomes the cornerstone of connected devices security. Our industry-leading SIM OS products enable over 2 billion SIMs. Our remote SIM provisioning and eSIM services drive this momentum further placing us amongst top 5 SIM vendors globally. Our 150 employees globally are guided by the vision of a world where every device can connect securely and reliably. For more information, go to kigen.com or speak to us here or on @KigenLtd on Twitter about #futureofSIM.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 146
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

VEON

Index Tower, Trade Centre, Dubai International Financial Centre , Dubai, AE
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

VEON is a global digital operator headquartered in Dubai, providing connectivity and digital services across dynamic frontier markets that are home to more than 6% of the world’s population. With our digital operators, we transform lives through technology-driven services that empower millions and drive economic growth. Social media guidelines: We want everybody to have a positive and welcoming experience across the social media channels we use - and so we ask that everyone keeps their comments and discussions on VEON's page, or posts tagging the company, respectful to other members and our teams. Content which is abusive or harassing, obscene, deceptive or misleading, contains false or defamatory information, is discriminatory against any individual or group, or is considered spam may be removed - including reporting and blocking users responsible from our social media channels.

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 13,316
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kigen.jpeg
Kigen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veon.jpeg
VEON
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kigen
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VEON
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kigen in 2026.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VEON in 2026.

Incident History — Kigen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kigen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VEON (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VEON cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kigen.jpeg
Kigen
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Java Card Virtual Machine implementation flaws
Motivation: Unauthorized access to eSIM profiles
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/veon.jpeg
VEON
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VEON company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kigen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Kigen and VEON have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, VEON company and Kigen company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VEON company nor Kigen company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VEON company nor Kigen company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

VEON company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Kigen company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Kigen company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while VEON company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VEON company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kigen company.

VEON company employs more people globally than Kigen company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kigen nor VEON holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H