Comparison Overview

Kier + Wright

VS

Mott MacDonald

Kier + Wright

2850 Collier Canyon Road, Livermore, California, 94551, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.kierwright.com

Kier + Wright (K+W) is a full-service civil engineering and land surveying firm that provides efficient, cost-effective, user-friendly civil engineering and land surveying services to clients of all types. We have been providing services of the highest quality to our clients since our doors opened in 1972. Civil engineering services include land planning, street and highway design, municipal consultation, utility engineering and the preparation of civil engineering plans for commercial, industrial and residential developments. Land surveying services include ALTA surveys, boundary and topographic surveys, subdivision mapping, monitoring surveys and construction staking. K+W has offices located in Livermore, Santa Clara, Irvine, Camarillo, Escondido, Sacramento, Manteca and Gilroy.

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 182
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Mott MacDonald

10 Fleet Place, London, EC4M 7, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
https://mottmac.com

We are an engineering, management and development consultancy and one of the largest wholly employee-owned firms of our kind. We plan, design, deliver and maintain the transport, energy, water, defence and security, and buildings infrastructure that is integral to people's daily lives. Our core strength is using our expertise to overcome complex challenges to deliver benefits for our clients and the communities they serve.

NAICS: 237
NAICS Definition: Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees: 24,383
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kier-wright.jpeg
Kier + Wright
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mott-macdonald.jpeg
Mott MacDonald
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kier + Wright
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mott MacDonald
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier + Wright in 2026.

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mott MacDonald in 2026.

Incident History — Kier + Wright (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier + Wright cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mott MacDonald (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mott MacDonald cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kier-wright.jpeg
Kier + Wright
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mott-macdonald.jpeg
Mott MacDonald
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mott MacDonald company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kier + Wright company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mott MacDonald company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kier + Wright company.

In the current year, Mott MacDonald company and Kier + Wright company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mott MacDonald company nor Kier + Wright company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mott MacDonald company nor Kier + Wright company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mott MacDonald company nor Kier + Wright company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kier + Wright company nor Mott MacDonald company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kier + Wright company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Mott MacDonald company.

Mott MacDonald company employs more people globally than Kier + Wright company, reflecting its scale as a Civil Engineering.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kier + Wright nor Mott MacDonald holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References