Comparison Overview

KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc.

VS

Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden

KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc.

61 Main St, Torrington, Connecticut, 06790, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

KidsPlay Children’s Museum operates over 11,000 sf of interactive, hands-on exhibits where children age 1 to 10 practice pre-academic skills, build curiosity and explore through developmental play. KidsPlay is a member of the Torrington School Readiness Council and works strategically with the Torrington Public Schools and other community partners to provide opportunities for informal family learning. The Museum presents learning concepts in ways that are meaningful and accessible to young children and enriches the educational landscape for families from across the socio-economic, cultural, and educational spectrum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden

909 Robert D. Ray Drive, Des Moines, Iowa, 50309, US
Last Update: 2026-01-19

The Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden is a vibrant, 12-acre public garden in the heart of downtown Des Moines. We are more than a dome and urban oasis. We’re the connection point between plants, people and the natural world. ​It’s a space where you can be who you are, do the things you love and spend time with the people who matter most. We welcome you to enjoy, discover, create, and FIND YOUR TRUE NATURE here. Our ongoing mission is exploring, explaining and celebrating the world of plants. Within an always friendly climate, we engage visitors through education, experience, and entertainment. As a renowned cultural institution, we cultivate diverse plants and link people to the environment surrounding them. The Botanical Garden is a 501(c)(3) privately governed, not-for-profit institution.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kidsplay-childrens-museum-inc.jpeg
KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greater-des-moines-botanical-garden.jpeg
Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden in 2026.

Incident History — KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kidsplay-childrens-museum-inc.jpeg
KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/greater-des-moines-botanical-garden.jpeg
Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company and Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company.

In the current year, Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company and KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company nor KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company nor KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company nor KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden company employs more people globally than KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KidsPlay Children's Museum, Inc. nor Greater Des Moines Botanical Garden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H