Comparison Overview

Kia America

VS

Stellantis

Kia America

111 Peters Canyon Rd, Irvine, CA, US, 92606
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Kia America is headquartered in Irvine, California and is a subsidiary of Kia Corporation. Kia’s technology-rich product lineup of cars, SUVs, and alternative-powered vehicles are backed by the industry-leading Kia 10-year/100,000-mile limited warranty program.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 4,176
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Stellantis

Amsterdam, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Our storied and iconic brands embody the passion of their visionary founders and today’s customers in their innovative products and services: they include Abarth, Alfa Romeo, Chrysler, Citroën, Dodge, DS Automobiles, Fiat, Jeep®, Lancia, Maserati, Opel, Peugeot, Ram, Vauxhall and mobility brands Free2move and Leasys. Powered by our diversity, we lead the way the world moves – aspiring to become the greatest sustainable mobility tech company, not the biggest, while creating added value for all stakeholders as well as the communities in which we operate.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 96,409
Subsidiaries: 30
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kia-america.jpeg
Kia America
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stellantis.jpeg
Stellantis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kia America
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stellantis
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kia America in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Stellantis has 952.63% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Kia America (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kia America cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stellantis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stellantis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kia-america.jpeg
Kia America
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Web Application
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stellantis.jpeg
Stellantis
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: OAuth Token Exploitation, Third-Party Integration (Salesloft's Drift AI chat tool), Salesforce Environment Pivoting
Motivation: Data Theft for Extortion, Phishing Campaign Enablement, Dark Web Data Monetization
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Third-Party Service Provider, Stolen OAuth Tokens, Salesforce Integration Exploitation
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion, Phishing Enablement
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: vishing, stolen OAuth tokens, exploitation of Salesforce vulnerabilities, Salesloft’s Drift AI chat integration
Motivation: financial gain, data extortion, reputation damage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Kia America company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stellantis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stellantis company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Kia America company.

In the current year, Stellantis company has reported more cyber incidents than Kia America company.

Both Stellantis company and Kia America company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Stellantis company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Kia America company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Stellantis company nor Kia America company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Kia America company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Stellantis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stellantis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Kia America company.

Stellantis company employs more people globally than Kia America company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kia America nor Stellantis holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H