Comparison Overview

Ketamine Therapy Center

VS

Counseling Institute of Atlanta

Ketamine Therapy Center

8631 W 3rd St, Los Angeles, 90048, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Ketamine Therapy Center at the Cedars-Sinai East Tower is a private group medical practice specializing in the treatment of severe depression and other mental health disorders. We offer ketamine infusion therapy, ketamine intramuscular injections, ketamine nasal spray, and ketamine-assisted psychotherapy. The first step is to schedule a comprehensive medical and psychiatric evaluation with a mental health professional, a psychiatrist/medical doctor specializing in screening patients for treatment-resistant depression, and someone skilled at prescribing ketamine therapy. Our office is located in Los Angeles, Southern California. Contact us today to schedule a 15-minute consult with a member of our team to answer your questions today.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Counseling Institute of Atlanta

5855 Jimmy Carter Blvd, Norcross, GA, 30071, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Counseling Institute of Atlanta, located in Gwinnett County in Metro Atlanta, is a healing, safe place for people to receive individual, family or couples counseling and therapy. Services are offered in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. Psychotherapy can help. It teaches truly effective ways to deal with common, everyday situations as well as more entrenched patterns of living. We believe that all feelings are part of being human. We help you to understand your feelings. We help you to get through difficult situations and to connect with your inner wisdom so you can make healthy choices. Many of the problems people face involve relationships. Improving these relationships is a mainstay of counseling. We specialize in: Family therapy, Couples therapy, and Immigration evaluations.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ketamine-therapy-center.jpeg
Ketamine Therapy Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/counseling-institute-of-atlanta.jpeg
Counseling Institute of Atlanta
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ketamine Therapy Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Counseling Institute of Atlanta
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ketamine Therapy Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Counseling Institute of Atlanta in 2026.

Incident History — Ketamine Therapy Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ketamine Therapy Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Counseling Institute of Atlanta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Counseling Institute of Atlanta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ketamine-therapy-center.jpeg
Ketamine Therapy Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/counseling-institute-of-atlanta.jpeg
Counseling Institute of Atlanta
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ketamine Therapy Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Counseling Institute of Atlanta company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Counseling Institute of Atlanta company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ketamine Therapy Center company.

In the current year, Counseling Institute of Atlanta company and Ketamine Therapy Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Counseling Institute of Atlanta company nor Ketamine Therapy Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Counseling Institute of Atlanta company nor Ketamine Therapy Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Counseling Institute of Atlanta company nor Ketamine Therapy Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center company nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center company nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ketamine Therapy Center nor Counseling Institute of Atlanta holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N