Comparison Overview

Kenvue

VS

Natura

Kenvue

None, None, Summit, New Jersey, US, 07901
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Kenvue is the world’s largest pure-play consumer health company by revenue. Built on more than a century of heritage and propelled forward by science, our iconic brands — including Aveeno®, BAND-AID® Brand Adhesive Bandages, Johnson’s®, Listerine®, Neutrogena®, Tylenol® and Zyrtec® — are recommended by health care professionals and can be trusted by consumers who use our products to improve their daily lives. Our team members share a digital-first mindset, with an approach to innovation grounded in deep human insights and work every day to earn a place for our products in consumers’ hearts and homes. At Kenvue, we believe everyday care can not only make people well; it can make them whole. Beware of recruitment scams: https://www.kenvue.com/media/recruitment-scams-alert

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 17,862
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Natura

Av. Alexandre Colares, 1.188, Vila Jaguara S√£o Paulo, S√£o Paulo 05106-0000, BR
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1969, Natura is a Brazilian multinational in the cosmetics and personal care segment, a leader in direct sales in Brazil, and recognized for protecting the Amazon social biodiversity through its sustainable business model. Cruelty free. 100% vegan. With 7,000 employees and 2 million beauty Consultants worldwide, Natura operates in 11 countries. In 2014, Natura became the first publicly traded company to receive B Corp ™ certification, and its third certification was concluded in 2020. Natura’s Ekos line is certified by the Union for Ethical Biotrade (UEBT). Learn more: natura.com

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kenvue
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natura
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenvue in 2025.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natura in 2025.

Incident History — Kenvue (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenvue cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenvue.jpeg
Kenvue
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natura company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kenvue company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Natura company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kenvue company.

In the current year, Natura company and Kenvue company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natura company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Natura company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Natura company nor Kenvue company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kenvue company nor Natura company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kenvue company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Natura company.

Kenvue company employs more people globally than Natura company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kenvue nor Natura holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H