Comparison Overview

Kentucky Science Center

VS

Moderna Museet

Kentucky Science Center

727 West Main Street, Louisville, KY, 40202, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://KYScienceCenter.org

Already recognized as a leader in inquiry-based learning, Kentucky Science Center is advancing a statewide science literacy campaign to encourage people of all ages to explore science in everyday life. Its flagship location on Louisville, KY’s historic Museum Row, welcomes visitors from across the globe with 3-floors of interactive exhibits and films on a 4-story screen. With daily programming for children, families, and adults, the Science Center plays an ongoing role in the region as a resource for caregivers and teachers, a gathering place for the science community, and a chosen source of entertainment for all.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 97
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Moderna Museet

Exercisplan 4, Stockholm, Skeppsholmen, SE, 111 49
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.modernamuseet.se

Moderna Museet collects, preserves, shares and exhibits modern and contemporary art. The Moderna Museet collection is one of Europe’s finest and includes art from the early 20th century and photography from 1840 and onwards. Our vision is to continue to work in the open and experimental spirit for which Moderna Museet has always been known. The presence of the art and the artists is our key concern, along with our dialogue with an actively participating audience. The collection includes key works by Marcel Duchamp, Louise Bourgeois, Pablo Picasso, Meret Oppenheim, Salvador Dalí, Eva Hesse and others, along with more recent works by contemporary artists such as Karin Mamma Andersson, Yinka Shonibare, Paul McCarthy, Annika von Hausswolff and Sirous Namazi. In addition to making the collection accessible to the public, Moderna Museet organize several temporary exhibitions each year and holds learning activities and events. Moderna Museet today is present in two cities, Stockholm and Malmö. Moderna Museet was founded in 1958 and is located on the island of Skeppsholmen in central Stockholm. In 2009, Moderna Museet Malmö was opened in the premises of the erstwhile Rooseum.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kentucky-science-center.jpeg
Kentucky Science Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moderna-museet.jpeg
Moderna Museet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kentucky Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Moderna Museet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kentucky Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moderna Museet in 2026.

Incident History — Kentucky Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kentucky Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Moderna Museet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moderna Museet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kentucky-science-center.jpeg
Kentucky Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/moderna-museet.jpeg
Moderna Museet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Kentucky Science Center company and Moderna Museet company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Moderna Museet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kentucky Science Center company.

In the current year, Moderna Museet company and Kentucky Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Moderna Museet company nor Kentucky Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Moderna Museet company nor Kentucky Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Moderna Museet company nor Kentucky Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kentucky Science Center company nor Moderna Museet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kentucky Science Center company nor Moderna Museet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Moderna Museet company employs more people globally than Kentucky Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kentucky Science Center nor Moderna Museet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References