Comparison Overview

Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise

VS

Niskanen Center

Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise

300 Kenan Drive, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Established in 1985 by Frank Hawkins Kenan, the Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise is a nonpartisan business policy think tank affiliated with the UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School. The nonprofit institute and its affiliated centers convene leaders from the private sector, academic community and government to build a greater understanding of how entrepreneurship, economic development and global commerce can work for the public good. The institute leverages best-in-class research to develop market-based solutions to today’s most complex economic challenges. In doing so, the institute aims to support businesses and policies that better the lives of people in North Carolina, across the country and around the world.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Niskanen Center

820 1st Street NE, Washington, D.C., District of Columbia, 20002, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Established in 2014, the Niskanen Center is a nonpartisan think tank that works to change public policy through direct engagement in the policymaking process: developing and promoting proposals to legislative and executive branch policymakers, building coalitions to facilitate joint action, and marshaling the most convincing arguments in support of our agenda. The Center’s main audience is the Washington insiders – policy-oriented legislators, presidential appointees, career civil servants in planning, evaluation and budget offices, congressional committee staff, engaged academics, and interest group analysts – who together decide the pace and direction of policy change. Follow us on Twitter at https://twitter.com/NiskanenCenter Like us on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/niskanencenter/

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 69
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenan-institute-of-private-enterprise.jpeg
Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Niskanen Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Niskanen Center in 2025.

Incident History — Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Niskanen Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Niskanen Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kenan-institute-of-private-enterprise.jpeg
Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/niskanen-center.jpeg
Niskanen Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company and Niskanen Center company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Niskanen Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company.

In the current year, Niskanen Center company and Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Niskanen Center company nor Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company nor Niskanen Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Niskanen Center company.

Both Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise company and Niskanen Center company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise nor Niskanen Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X