Comparison Overview

Keltie

VS

Musick, Peeler & Garrett

Keltie

No. 1 London Bridge, London, undefined, SE1 9BA, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Keltie is based in Europe but operates globally. Our teams of patent and trade mark practitioners have decades of experience handling intellectual property matters across all business sectors and industries. We act for many household names, entrepreneurial individuals, start-ups, spin-outs and large corporations who wish to identify, establish, manage and protect their IP in the UK, Europe and worldwide. Follow Keltie LLP on Twitter at twitter.com/KeltieLLP

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 139
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Musick, Peeler & Garrett

None, None, None, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

With offices in five major commercial centers across the state, Musick Peeler attorneys know California. Founded in 1954, Musick Peeler has kept pace with California’s growth and with more than 100 attorneys, we have the resources and expertise to offer the highest quality representation in a wide variety of legal matters. While Musick Peeler clients enjoy the advantages of working with an independent law firm, we recognize that California businesses often require representation and advice in national and international matters. Our attorneys speak a multitude of languages and several of our practice groups focus on international clients doing business in California and overseas. Together with our membership in Ally Law, an exclusive alliance of international law firms, Musick Peeler is well-equipped to ensure the seamless delivery of legal services across the globe. We are proud to offer our clients the geographic reach of a global firm while maintaining the unique culture and advantages of a regional firm focused on providing each client with individualized attention. Of course, our client service has not gone unnoticed. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their field earning selections as Super Lawyers®, rankings in Chambers USA, Best Lawyers in America, Benchmark Litigation and Martindale-Hubbell’s® highest AV® rating for technical skill and ethics. Outside of the firm, many of our lawyers are noted community leaders, hold political office and teach at various universities.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keltie-llp.jpeg
Keltie
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Musick, Peeler & Garrett
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Keltie
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Musick, Peeler & Garrett
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keltie in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Musick, Peeler & Garrett in 2025.

Incident History — Keltie (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keltie cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Musick, Peeler & Garrett (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Musick, Peeler & Garrett cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keltie-llp.jpeg
Keltie
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Musick, Peeler & Garrett
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Musick, Peeler & Garrett company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Keltie company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Musick, Peeler & Garrett company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Keltie company.

In the current year, Musick, Peeler & Garrett company and Keltie company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Musick, Peeler & Garrett company nor Keltie company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Musick, Peeler & Garrett company nor Keltie company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Musick, Peeler & Garrett company nor Keltie company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Keltie company nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Keltie company nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Keltie company employs more people globally than Musick, Peeler & Garrett company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Keltie nor Musick, Peeler & Garrett holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X