Comparison Overview

KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD

VS

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD

208 S La Brea Ave, Inglewood, California, 90301, US
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Residential Real Estate investments

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Keller Williams Realty, LLC

Suite 400, None, Austin, TX, US, 78746
Last Update: 2025-09-05 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Austin, Texas-based Keller Williams, the worldโ€™s largest real estate franchise by agent count, has more than 1,100 offices and 176,000 agents. The franchise is also No. 1 in units and sales volume in the United States. Since 1983, the company has cultivated an agent-centric, technology-driven, and education-based culture that rewards agents as stakeholders. For more information, visit headquarters.kw.com.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 109,741
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-inglewood.jpeg
KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-realty-llc.jpeg
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD in 2025.

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keller Williams Realty, LLC in 2025.

Incident History โ€” KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Keller Williams Realty, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keller Williams Realty, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-inglewood.jpeg
KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keller-williams-realty-llc.jpeg
Keller Williams Realty, LLC
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2017
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company and Keller Williams Realty, LLC company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company has not reported any.

In the current year, Keller Williams Realty, LLC company and KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Keller Williams Realty, LLC company nor KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has disclosed at least one data breach, while KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Keller Williams Realty, LLC company nor KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company nor Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company.

Keller Williams Realty, LLC company employs more people globally than KELLER WILLIAMS iNGLEWOOD company, reflecting its scale as a Real Estate.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X