Comparison Overview

Keilen Law

VS

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick

Keilen Law

141 E. Michigan Ave., Kalamazoo, 49007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

As a Kalamazoo Business Lawyer, Attorney Keilen is located at 141 E. Michigan Avenue, #602, Kalamazoo, MI 49007; he is a Board Member and Attorney Representative for Kalamazoo Plus; he is an Advisory Board Member for the Michigan Medical Device Accelerator. Attorney Keilen has a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) from the Michigan State University College of Law, a Master’s in Business Administration (M.B.A.) from Western Michigan University and a Bachelor’s in Business Administration (B.B.A.) from Michigan State University. He is licensed to practice law in the State of Michigan and in the Federal US District Court for the Western District of Michigan. Attorney Keilen is a Kalamazoo, MI trial and business lawyer; he is also the founder/owner of a local medical device company, giving him a unique appreciation for the legal issues in today’s business environment. Attorney Keilen has been a guest speaker and sponsor for projects at the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences at Western Michigan University. He has also been a guest speaker for the Innovation & Design Program at the University of Michigan. Attorney Keilen has a strong reputation for helping businesses and entrepreneurs meet their goals. Attorney Keilen’s primary practice areas are: Commercial Litigation, Business/Corporate Law, Intellectual Property Law, and Estate Planning. Attorney Keilen lives in Kalamazoo, Michigan with his wife and daughter. He is an avid marathon runner and attends St. Catherine’s Catholic Church in Portage, Michigan. He is a member of the State Bar of Michigan. Attorney Keilen has a passion for law and consistently exceeds his clients’ expectations. He has the background and experience to carefully maneuver the challenges of litigation and plan for sound business practices and transactions, thereby securing protection for his clients’ businesses, families, assets, and ideas. Contact Attorney Keilen directly at: Keilen Law, PLC, 141 E. Michigan Avenue, #602, Kalamazoo, MI 49007 Email: [email protected] Office: (269) 382-4818 – Fax: (269) 459-1478

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick

Level 16, Melbourne, Vic, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick is a leading full service intellectual property firm in Australia. With offices in Melbourne, Sydney and Adelaide, the Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick Group incorporates a patent and trade marks attorney firm, an intellectual property law firm and a research and investigation company. The POF Group offers a comprehensive range of legal services to assist clients identify, protect, manage, exploit and enforce their intellectual property assets, including patents, trade marks, designs and copyright. We are one of a small number of Australian businesses whose core focus is intellectual property, and who can provide the full range of legal services associated with IP from conception to enforcement. We offer clients a superior customer focused service that is tailored to meet their individual needs.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keilen-law.jpeg
Keilen Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-ormonde-fitzpatrick.jpeg
Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Keilen Law
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keilen Law in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick in 2025.

Incident History — Keilen Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keilen Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keilen-law.jpeg
Keilen Law
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/phillips-ormonde-fitzpatrick.jpeg
Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Keilen Law company and Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Keilen Law company.

In the current year, Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company and Keilen Law company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company nor Keilen Law company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company nor Keilen Law company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company nor Keilen Law company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Keilen Law company nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Keilen Law company nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick company employs more people globally than Keilen Law company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Keilen Law nor Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X