Comparison Overview

Keen Law Offices, LLC

VS

Standley Law Group LLP

Keen Law Offices, LLC

84058, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 800 and 849

Keen Law Offices accepts clients with immigration and criminal defense needs. Whether the client needs to resolve deportation issues, obtain a visa, criminal defense work, post conviction relief, or other related matters, Keen Law Offices can assist. Our firm takes an approach of considering the client's goals and reviewing with the client realistic expectations, and then working feverishly to accomplish the client's goals.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Standley Law Group LLP

6300 Riverside Drive, Dublin, OH, 43017, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Standley Law Group LLP specializes in the practice of Intellectual Property Law, including Patent, Trademark, Copyright, Trade Secret, Unfair Competition, and Computer Law. Attorneys in the firm provide a wide range of intellectual property law services including preparation and prosecution of applications, counseling, litigation, and licensing, as well as corresponding practices in foreign countries. Since 1994, Standley Law Group has been assisting clients ranging from Fortune 1000 companies to medium sized companies and individuals, with a variety of intellectual property needs. Attorneys in the firm have diverse technological backgrounds, and have been involved in the representation of clients in a wide variety of sciences, including:  * Aircraft components  * Automotive components  * Biochemistry and Biotech  * Business processes  * Chemistry  * Computer hardware & software  * Electrical devices  * Electrical energy generation  * Environmental remediation  * Furniture designs  * Liquid crystal displays  * Materials  * Mechanical devices  * Medical devices  * Packaging  * Plastics / Molding  * Robotics  * Telecommunications

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keen-law-offices-llc.jpeg
Keen Law Offices, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standley-law-group-llp.jpeg
Standley Law Group LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Keen Law Offices, LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Standley Law Group LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keen Law Offices, LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Standley Law Group LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Keen Law Offices, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keen Law Offices, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Standley Law Group LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Standley Law Group LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keen-law-offices-llc.jpeg
Keen Law Offices, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/standley-law-group-llp.jpeg
Standley Law Group LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Keen Law Offices, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Standley Law Group LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Standley Law Group LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Keen Law Offices, LLC company.

In the current year, Standley Law Group LLP company and Keen Law Offices, LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Standley Law Group LLP company nor Keen Law Offices, LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Standley Law Group LLP company nor Keen Law Offices, LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Standley Law Group LLP company nor Keen Law Offices, LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC company nor Standley Law Group LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC company nor Standley Law Group LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Standley Law Group LLP company employs more people globally than Keen Law Offices, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Keen Law Offices, LLC nor Standley Law Group LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X