Comparison Overview

KEC International Ltd.

VS

Kier Group

KEC International Ltd.

1st Floor, RPG House, 463, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400 030
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

KEC International Limited, the flagship company of RPG Enterprises is a diversified global infrastructure Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC) major, with a presence in the verticals of Power Transmission & Distribution, Railways, Civil, Urban Infrastructure, Oil & Gas Pipelines, Solar, Smart Infra and Cables. KEC is a USD 2.4 billion diversified infrastructure EPC major building infrastructure globally. With over seven decades of experience, footprint in 110+ countries and presently executing projects in 30+ countries, KEC has made an indelible mark on the world map. Through constant and consistent re-engineering KEC reinvents itself to retain its leadership position in the areas of quality, technology, capacity and capability. KEC's strengths lie in the areas of Design, Manufacturing, Supply and Construction of Turnkey Projects of Power Transmission lines of voltages up to 1,200 kV, in setting up Sub-stations and power Distribution Networks, Optical Fibre Cable (OPGW) installations, turnkey railway infrastructure, civil infrastructure projects & renewable energy projects. KEC has one of the largest global annual production capacities of 4,22,000 MTs, which includes the production of towers, poles, hardware, structures for railways & solar. The company has 8 factories in India, UAE and the Americas. The Company has over 9,000 employees from 35+ nationalities.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 12,425
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kier Group

Cavendish Place, UK, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Our purpose is to sustainably deliver infrastructure which is vital to the UK. As a leading provider of infrastructure services, construction and property developments, we are committed to delivering for communities and leaving lasting legacies through our work. We are committed to attracting, retaining and progressing talent within Kier, with a diverse, and resilient workforce that reflects the communities we serve. Follow the pages below to find out even more about what we do and the talented people we have within Kier and our supply chains who are helping us to meet our purpose. Kier Construction: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-construction Kier Transportation: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-transportation Kier Natural Resources, Nuclear & Networks: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-natural-resources-nuclear-networks Kier Property: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kier-property Kier Places: https://www.linkedin.com/showcase/kierplaces www.kier.co.uk

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 10,990
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kec-international-ltd..jpeg
KEC International Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kier-group.jpeg
Kier Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KEC International Ltd.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kier Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KEC International Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kier Group in 2026.

Incident History — KEC International Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KEC International Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kier Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kier Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kec-international-ltd..jpeg
KEC International Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kier-group.jpeg
Kier Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

KEC International Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Kier Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Kier Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to KEC International Ltd. company.

In the current year, Kier Group company and KEC International Ltd. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kier Group company nor KEC International Ltd. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kier Group company nor KEC International Ltd. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kier Group company nor KEC International Ltd. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KEC International Ltd. company nor Kier Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Kier Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to KEC International Ltd. company.

KEC International Ltd. company employs more people globally than Kier Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KEC International Ltd. nor Kier Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N