Comparison Overview

Keatext AI

VS

iFood

Keatext AI

5605 de Gaspé, Montréal, Quebec, H2T2A4, CA
Last Update: 2025-03-08 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Keatext brings the voice of customer and employee into your day-to-day activities. Easily understand what drives engagement and get tailored AI-based recommendations to improve people experiences.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

iFood

Avenida dos Autonomistas, Osasco, São Paulo, 06020-010, BR
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

O iFood é uma empresa brasileira de tecnologia, que aproxima clientes, restaurantes e entregadores de forma simples e prática. O iFood tem o propósito de alimentar o futuro do Brasil e do mundo, transformando a sociedade por meio da educação e da tecnologia, da segurança alimentar, da inclusão e com um impacto socioambiental positivo. Com mais de 80 milhões de pedidos mensais, o iFood atua com inteligência de negócio e soluções de gestão para promover e desenvolver um ecossistema de mais de 330 mil estabelecimentos cadastrados, 250 mil entregadores conectados em mais de 1700 cidades em todo o Brasil. Há 12 anos no mercado, a empresa vai além do food delivery e cresce também em negócios de Mercado, iFood Pago, unindo tecnologia e conveniência na entrega de soluções aos parceiros. Para mais informações sobre o iFood, suas novidades e a nossa fome de alimentar o mundo, acesse: https://www.news.ifood.com.br/

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 19,092
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keatext.jpeg
Keatext AI
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifood-.jpeg
iFood
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Keatext AI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
iFood
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Keatext AI in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for iFood in 2025.

Incident History — Keatext AI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Keatext AI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — iFood (X = Date, Y = Severity)

iFood cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/keatext.jpeg
Keatext AI
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ifood-.jpeg
iFood
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Keatext AI company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to iFood company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, iFood company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Keatext AI company.

In the current year, iFood company and Keatext AI company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither iFood company nor Keatext AI company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither iFood company nor Keatext AI company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither iFood company nor Keatext AI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Keatext AI company nor iFood company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

iFood company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Keatext AI company.

iFood company employs more people globally than Keatext AI company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X