Comparison Overview

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회

VS

Xerox

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회

None
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://kccd.or.kr

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD), in collaboration with the Korea Exchange (KRX) is committed to enhancing corporate governance and protectinginancial consumers in South Korea and Global KCCD provides corporate boards with strategic guidance to strengthen transparency, accountability, and leadership in an increasingly complex macroeconomic and regulatory environment.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Xerox

201 Merritt 7, Norwalk, Connecticut, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 650 and 699
http://www.xerox.com

Xerox has been redefining the workplace experience for over a century. As a services-led, software-enabled company, we power today’s hybrid workplace through advanced print, digital, and AI-driven technologies. In 2025, Xerox acquired Lexmark—expanding our global footprint, strengthening service capabilities, and equipping us to deliver an even broader portfolio of workplace technologies to our clients. Today, we continue our legacy of innovation to deliver client-centric, digitally driven solutions that meet the needs of a global, distributed workforce. Whether in offices, classrooms, or hospitals, we help our clients thrive in a constantly evolving business landscape.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 50,167
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kccd.jpeg
Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xerox.jpeg
Xerox
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Xerox
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 has 16.28% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Xerox in 2025.

Incident History — Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Xerox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Xerox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kccd.jpeg
Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/xerox.jpeg
Xerox
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Xerox company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Xerox company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company.

In the current year, Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company has reported more cyber incidents than Xerox company.

Neither Xerox company nor Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Xerox company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Xerox company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company nor Xerox company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Xerox company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company.

Xerox company employs more people globally than Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Korea Council of Corporate Directors (KCCD) / 한국기업이사회협의회 nor Xerox holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

WeGIA is an open source Web Manager for Institutions with a focus on Portuguese language users. Versions 3.5.4 and below contain a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the /WeGIA/html/geral/configurar_senhas.php endpoint. The application does not sanitize user-controlled data before rendering it inside the employee selection dropdown. The application retrieves employee names from the database and injects them directly into HTML <option> elements without proper escaping. This issue is fixed in version 3.5.5.

Published
Date
2025-12-09
Updated
Date
2025-12-09
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.0.0-rc.1 through 4.7.0 are vulnerable to DOM-Based XSS through the Zitadel V2 logout endpoint. The /logout endpoint insecurely routes to a value that is supplied in the post_logout_redirect GET parameter. As a result, unauthenticated remote attacker can execute malicious JS code on Zitadel users’ browsers. To carry out an attack, multiple user sessions need to be active in the same browser, however, account takeover is mitigated when using Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) or Passwordless authentication. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-09
Updated
Date
2025-12-09
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

ZITADEL is an open-source identity infrastructure tool. Versions 4.7.0 and below are vulnerable to an unauthenticated, full-read SSRF vulnerability. The ZITADEL Login UI (V2) treats the x-zitadel-forward-host header as a trusted fallback for all deployments, including self-hosted instances. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to force the server to make HTTP requests to arbitrary domains, such as internal addresses, and read the responses, enabling data exfiltration and bypassing network-segmentation controls. This issue is fixed in version 4.7.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-09
Updated
Date
2025-12-09
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NiceGUI is a Python-based UI framework. Versions 3.3.1 and below are vulnerable to directory traversal through the App.add_media_files() function, which allows a remote attacker to read arbitrary files on the server filesystem. This issue is fixed in version 3.4.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-09
Updated
Date
2025-12-09
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

FreePBX Endpoint Manager is a module for managing telephony endpoints in FreePBX systems. Versions are vulnerable to authentication bypass when the authentication type is set to "webserver." When providing an Authorization header with an arbitrary value, a session is associated with the target user regardless of valid credentials. This issue is fixed in versions 16.0.44 and 17.0.23.

Published
Date
2025-12-09
Updated
Date
2025-12-09
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References