Comparison Overview

KBC Bank & Verzekering

VS

Wells Fargo

KBC Bank & Verzekering

Havenlaan 2, 1000 Brussel, Brussels, BE, 1080
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Welkom op de officiële LinkedIn-pagina van KBC! Bekijk onze vacatures op de tab ‘Vacatures’. KBC is een geïntegreerde bank-verzekeraar die zich hoofdzakelijk richt op particulieren en privatebankingcliënten, en op kleine en middelgrote ondernemingen. KBC heeft een leidende positie in zijn thuismarkten in België en Centraal- en Oost-Europa, en is selectief aanwezig in de rest van de wereld.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,414
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wells Fargo

420 Montgomery St, San Francisco, California, US, 94103
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 800 and 849

Wells Fargo & Company (NYSE: WFC) is a diversified, community-based financial services company with approximately $1.9 trillion in assets. Wells Fargo’s vision is to satisfy our customers’ financial needs and help them succeed financially. Founded in 1852 and headquartered in San Francisco, Wells Fargo provides banking, investment and mortgage products and services, as well as consumer and commercial finance, through more than 7,300 locations, 12,000 ATMs, the internet (wellsfargo.com) and mobile banking, and has offices in over 40 countries and territories to support customers who conduct business in the global economy. With approximately 250,000 team members, Wells Fargo serves one in three households in the United States. Wells Fargo & Company was ranked No. 41 on Fortune’s 2022 rankings of America’s largest corporations. News, insights and perspectives from Wells Fargo are also available at Wells Fargo Stories. Relevant military experience is considered for veterans and transitioning service men and women. All qualified applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability, status as a protected veteran, or any other legally protected characteristic.© 2016 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. All rights reserved. Member FDIC.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 221,512
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kbc-bank-en-verzekering.jpeg
KBC Bank & Verzekering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wellsfargo.jpeg
Wells Fargo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
KBC Bank & Verzekering
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wells Fargo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for KBC Bank & Verzekering in 2026.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wells Fargo in 2026.

Incident History — KBC Bank & Verzekering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

KBC Bank & Verzekering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wells Fargo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wells Fargo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kbc-bank-en-verzekering.jpeg
KBC Bank & Verzekering
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wellsfargo.jpeg
Wells Fargo
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access (Insider)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2019
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Human Error (Email Misdelivery)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Wells Fargo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to KBC Bank & Verzekering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Wells Fargo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas KBC Bank & Verzekering company has not reported any.

In the current year, Wells Fargo company and KBC Bank & Verzekering company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wells Fargo company nor KBC Bank & Verzekering company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Wells Fargo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while KBC Bank & Verzekering company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Wells Fargo company nor KBC Bank & Verzekering company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering company nor Wells Fargo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

KBC Bank & Verzekering company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Wells Fargo company.

Wells Fargo company employs more people globally than KBC Bank & Verzekering company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither KBC Bank & Verzekering nor Wells Fargo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N