Comparison Overview

Kara Santa Ana Photography

VS

Starloft Photography

Kara Santa Ana Photography

94th st, Vancouver, WA, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-13

Kara Santa Ana Photography is based in Portland, OR and specializes in natural light and studio portraiture and high end digital retouching. We provide services for weddings, engagements, senior portraiture, professional and model headshots, fashion and beauty portraiture and maternity. Well versed in the latest portraiture trends and modern preferences, we are a cutting edge photography studio, offering the most recent advances in the field. Geared towards our distinctive clientele, our approach delivers the perfect combination of timeless elegance coupled with a contemporary, fresh style. We focus on journalistic style photography. Limiting the number of posed and staged photographs, we try, instead, to highlight the laughter and emotion a person feels naturally. Understanding that each person is unique in their style, personality, and biography, we produce images that reflect that individuality. The era of boring, common, ordinary albums is over. Because we understand our clients' needs for exclusive, classic products that exceed their expectations, we represent joy, distinction, and style -- the very best that are possible in portrait photography.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Starloft Photography

40305 Michigan Ave, Canton, Michigan, 48188, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 700 and 749

Starloft Photography, owned by Jennifer Arnett, is a custom portrait studio located in Canton, Michigan. We specialize in headshots and personal brand photography. When you come to us, you will have the benefits of a highly customized experience that is structured to meet your unique needs. You can view more of our work at: https://www.starloft.com/ Call us at 734-335-0213 to book.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kara-santa-ana-photography.jpeg
Kara Santa Ana Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starloft.jpeg
Starloft Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kara Santa Ana Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Starloft Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kara Santa Ana Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Starloft Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Kara Santa Ana Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kara Santa Ana Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Starloft Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Starloft Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kara-santa-ana-photography.jpeg
Kara Santa Ana Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/starloft.jpeg
Starloft Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Kara Santa Ana Photography company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Starloft Photography company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Starloft Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kara Santa Ana Photography company.

In the current year, Starloft Photography company and Kara Santa Ana Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Starloft Photography company nor Kara Santa Ana Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Starloft Photography company nor Kara Santa Ana Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Starloft Photography company nor Kara Santa Ana Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography company nor Starloft Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography company nor Starloft Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Kara Santa Ana Photography company and Starloft Photography company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kara Santa Ana Photography nor Starloft Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N