Comparison Overview

Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters

VS

McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A.

Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters

230 S Broad St #1303, Philadelphia, PA, 19102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporting & Litigation Support, with more than 35 years of global industry experience, offers a wide range of worldwide professional court reporting services from its headquarters in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Our court reporting services serve the following legal needs: depositions & court reporting, day in the life video depositions & legal videography, litigation support, jury consulting & trial preparation, deposition summaries, internet streaming, digital forensics, E-discovery databases, and Verbatim Records or Realtime Text Displays. Last-minute depositions or emergency hearings are never a problem. Urgent legal transcript requests will be furnished expeditiously. Our court reporting team is fully equipped to handle all of your international court reporting needs even within the shortest of timelines, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Prompt, professional and cost-effective service is what sets Kaplan, Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters & Litigation Support Experts apart from our competition. Kaplan, Leaman & Wolfe’s professional and knowledgeable staff has experience within a vast array of industries. We will analyze your corporation’s needs, budget and cost structures and assign a dedicated team to fulfill every aspect of your legal requests while adhering to your corporate goals and values.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A.

311 S. Missouri Avenue, Clearwater, 33756, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Law Firm of McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A., established its community foundation through the efforts of the late Lloyd M. Phillips in 1946. Over the years, the desire to serve the public has prompted several attorneys in our Firm to serve our community as judges, thereby continuing the proud legacy of this Law Firm. Although the Firm has witnessed many changes in the legal profession, it has continued to adapt to the new and growing demands which have been placed on the legal system in recent years, without sacrificing the traditional, fundamental principles upon which the Firm was established. Our Commitment Our Law Firm is committed to providing you with prompt and efficient service on a personalized basis while continuing to remain financially competitive within the profession. Because of the complicated nature of legal problems in today's society, our broad range of services and resources enables us to assist you by counseling you as to your legal alternatives.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaplan-leaman-and-wolfe.jpeg
Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-gould-lyons-sullivan-&-hogan-p.a..jpeg
McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. in 2025.

Incident History — Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kaplan-leaman-and-wolfe.jpeg
Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-gould-lyons-sullivan-&-hogan-p.a..jpeg
McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company and McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company.

In the current year, McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company and Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company nor Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company nor Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company nor Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters company employs more people globally than McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Kaplan Leaman & Wolfe Court Reporters nor McFarland, Gould, Lyons, Sullivan & Hogan, P.A. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X